Towards the last few months of
Raghuram Rajan’s tenure as Reserve Bank of India (RBI) chief, the bond markets
were sending him a quiet note of dissent.
Do the bonds markets know something that Rajan didn’t?
Towards the last few months of
Raghuram Rajan’s tenure as Reserve Bank of India (RBI) chief, the bond markets
were sending him a quiet note of dissent. After his last, reluctant cut in repo
rates in April, he skipped further cuts in his June and August monetary policies,
obviously because retail inflation was trending higher, crossing the 6 percent
mark in July.
But consider what the bond markets
were up to all this time. From a peak of 7.8 percent in February 2016, the
10-year benchmark government of India bond has been falling in a sustained
manner, and now stands just above 7 percent. At the latest government bond
auction, the new 10-year GOI saw a cutoff yield of 6.97 percent, clearly below
7 percent.
On the retail side, the vibrant
tax-free bonds market, is also showing the same trend. The NHAI 8.75 percent tax-free
bond 2029 looked set to fall below a 6 percent yield-to-maturity, clocking 6.06
percent on Tuesday morning trades. If the main government bond markets remain
below 7 percent, the long-term tax-free bond markets will tumble too. Tax-free
bonds are issued only by government companies, and thus mirror the risk-free
status of government of India bonds to a large extent.
Do the bonds markets know something
that Rajan didn’t? One reason why bond markets and governors view the future of
inflation differently is simple: the markets look ahead through the windshield
and what may be coming; the RBI looks more at the rearview mirror, at data
points that will support his thesis for a rate cut (or increase or status quo).
Clearly, therefore, the bond markets have a different view from that of the governor
who just hung his boots.
There can be several explanations for
why the bond markets continuously brought down yields when the central bank was
more cautious.
One, the markets could have had a
more benign view of medium-term inflation than the central bank, possibly
looking at a food price fall after a normal monsoon.
Two, they expect demand for credit to
remain low, a fact that remains true at this point. In the financial year to
mid-August, bank credit to the commercial sector was static, growing by a
minuscule 0.1 percent between March and 19 August.
Three, since banks define the bond
market (they are the main buyers and sellers), it could also mean that safe
government bonds are a better bet than lending to companies, when capital is
not available at a good price. This is especially true for public sector banks,
which have huge bad loans and badly need higher dollops of capital before they
can lend again in a big way.
Four, there may be a broader flight
to safety in government bonds, as global factors are now looking worse than
before. The US Fed hems and haws over a rate hike; the European Central Bank has
been working the printing presses to print more euros to get growth up (one estimate
is that it has printed more than 3,000 euros for every man, woman and child in
the EU). The EU is clearly in trouble after Brexit, with the markets wondering
if Italy will be the next domino to fall. Japan’s Shinzo Abe is said to be
plotting another stimulus package, and the world’s biggest hedge fund is
predicting a banking bust in China, which means more money will be printed to recapitalise
its banking system.
What we are seeing everywhere except
India is a burst of reckless monetary policies and wayward government actions. In this scenario, India is the last
man standing, with sensible monetary and fiscal policies being pursued. But in a world making money cheaper
and cheaper, Indian interest rates clearly cannot sustain. We are not an island.
If banks bid for 10-year paper at
6.97 percent when deposit rates for terms above one year are in the 7-7.5
percent rates (64 percent of bank deposits in fixed deposits), there is no way
they can be making a spread on government paper. They will be losing money.
But banks are not foolish. They
obviously will bring deposit rates down and expect the RBI to cut rates too,
willy-nilly.
More than the level of retail
interest rates, which the RBI is fixated on, the bond markets seem to have many
more reasons to think rates should be trending down.
Banks, of course, have an interest in
lower bond yields. When bond yields fall, they can make a killing as their
existing stocks of bonds rise in price, giving them capital gains that can be
used to bolster profits.
The bond markets are telling a story
different from the RBI, and it is worth listening to them. They can do what
governors hesitate to. It’s time for Urjit Patel, the new Governor, to listen
to what the bond markets are saying, and not just what the CPI numbers tell.
However, it is difficult to expect a
new Governor, who is still to establish his credibility, to cut rates in his
very first credit policy. Our best bet would be to expect one in November or
December, which will also bring corroboration on a downtrend in cereal prices.