Why Swamy’s Case Against Rajan Is Weak

Subramanian Swamy has gone after the Gandhi family over the last few years and been fairly successful at it. Now he seems to have moved on to a new target ̶  Reserve Bank of India Governor Raghuram Rajan. Swamy, who recently became a Rajya Sabha member, wrote a letter to Prime Minister Narendra Modi, asking him to terminate the services of the RBI governor immediately or when his term ends in September, later this year.

Let’s take the point of Rajan raising interest rates turning out to be disastrous. When Rajan took over as the RBI governor, inflation was close to ten percent. Interest rates offered on bank fixed deposits were lower than that. Hence, people were losing money once inflation was taken into account.

Due to this, money had moved into real estate as well as gold, as people looked for a “real” rate of return. In fact, when Rajan took over as RBI governor, the rupee was rapidly losing value against the dollar. One of the reasons was that there was a huge demand for dollars because Indians were buying gold to hedge against inflation. Rajan cracked down on this, and managed to stabilise the value of the rupee.

The stabilisation of the rupee was important because India imports 80 percent of the oil that it consumes. And when the rupee depreciates oil becomes expensive in rupee terms. This isn’t good for the government nor the overall economy. Also, over the years high inflation has essentially ensured that the household financial savings as a proportion of the gross domestic product have been falling. Between 2005-2006 and 2007-2008, the average rate of household financial savings stood at 11.6 percent of the GDP. In 2009-2010, it rose to 12 percent of GDP. By 2011-2012, it had fallen to seven percent of the GDP. The household financial savings in 2014-2015 stood at 7.5 percent of GDP.

Household financial savings is essentially a term used to refer to the money invested by individuals in fixed deposits, small savings schemes of India Post, mutual funds, shares, insurance, provident and pension funds, etc. A major part of household financial savings in India is held in the form of bank fixed deposits and post office small savings schemes.

Since the beginning of 2015, after a very long time, the interest rates on fixed deposits have been in real territory. And this is a very important achievement for Rajan. The interest rates need to stay in real territory, if household financial savings need to go up, in the years to come.

In fact, it needs to be said here that Rajan recognises the fact that interest rates are not just about borrowers. They are also about savers as well. The savers include the young trying to save for the future of their children and the old trying to live a decent life in retirement. And savers need to be paid a reasonable rate of return on their savings as well. This is something that Rajan set right.

Swamy further said:

It is important to understand here why the Rajan led RBI moved from following inflation as measured by the wholesale price index to inflation as measured by the consumer price index. When the RBI tracked inflation as measured by the wholesale price index, it took a very long time to raise interest rates, and by the time the high consumer price inflation had well and truly set in.

This data clearly shows that these firms are doing much better than the big listed firms, over the last three years. Aarati Krishnan writing in The Hindu Business Line points out:

So what is Swamy really talking about here? And why is he misleading the prime minister Modi in particular and the nation in general?

Swamy further says: “Thus, in the last two years estimated NPA in public sector banks has doubled to Rs. 3-1/2 lakhs crores.”

What Swamy is basically saying is that the high interest rate regime initiated by the RBI led to small and medium enterprises defaulting on their loans and bad loans of public sector banks doubling. The first point that needs to be made here is that before Rajan took over as the governor of RBI, banks were not recognising their bad loans. He has pushed them to recognise their bad loans. Hence, the jump in bad loans has been primarily because of that.

Also, defaults by mid and large corporates are a very important reason for public sector banks being in the mess that they are in. Crony capitalists close to the previous UPA regime are primarily responsible for this.

The last that I checked the RBI was a regulator of banks and did not give out any loans. So how can the RBI governor be held responsible for what are basically bad lending decisions by banks? How can the RBI governor be held responsible for banks not insisting on enough collateral for the loans that they gave out? And how can the RBI governor be held responsible for politicians forcing public sector banks to give loans to crony capitalists?

Swamy further said:

I agree with the part of the statement which says that Rajan is acting as a disrupter of the Indian economy.

In fact, on many fronts, the Indian economy did need a disrupter. Rajan has forced banks to start recognising their bad loans instead of extending and pretending, as they were doing earlier. This has brought out the real situation that public sector banks are in. Further, he has also empowered banks to go after defaulters. A few Indian promoters have started selling their assets in order to repay banks. This is something that hasn’t happened before.

Swamy also accused Rajan of being mentally not fully Indian.

Rajan still has an Indian passport. This after having lived in the United States for more than 25 years. How many Indians who have lived in the United States for 25 years still have an Indian passport?

Swamy finally asked for the termination of Rajan’s appointment as RBI governor. He asks

This is a very silly argument. Appointing Rajan as the RBI governor was one of the few correct things that the UPA government did in the second half of its second term. Why undo that?