FLASH SALE: Subscribe For Just ₹̶2̶9̶9̶9̶ ₹699

Claim Now|
0H 0M 0S
Swarajya Logo
  • Politics
  • States
  • Economy
  • Society
  • Business
  • Culture
  • Infra
  • Defence
  • World
  • Books
  • Ideas
  • Science
  • Technology
  • Heritage
  • Archives
  • Legal
  • Movies
  • Sports
  • Our Views
    • Politics
    • States
    • Economy
    • Society
    • Business
    • Culture
    • Infra
    • Defence
    • World
    • Books
    • Ideas
    • Science
    • Technology
    • Heritage
    • Archives
    • Legal
    • Movies
    • Sports
  • Magazine
  • Headlines
  • Store

About Swarajya

Swarajya is a publication by Kovai Media Private Limited.

Swarajya - a big tent for liberal right of centre discourse that reaches out, engages and caters to the new India.

editor@swarajyamag.com

Useful Links

  • About Us
  • Subscriptions Support
  • Editorial Philosophy
  • Press Kit
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Code of Conduct
  • Plagiarism Policy
  • Refund & Cancellation Policy

Useful Links

  • About Us
  • Subscriptions Support
  • Editorial Philosophy
  • Press Kit
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Code of Conduct
  • Plagiarism Policy
  • Refund & Cancellation Policy

Participate

  • Contact Us
  • Write for us
  • Style Guide
  • Jobs

Stay Connected

  • Artboard 2 Copy 6Created with Sketch.
    Artboard 2 Copy 10Created with Sketch.
    Artboard 2 Copy 7Created with Sketch.
    Artboard 2 Copy 9Created with Sketch.
  • Andriod Logo
  • IOS Logo

World

When The World Leaders Thought Passports Were Not A Necessity

Speranta Dumitru

Oct 29, 2016, 10:44 AM | Updated 10:43 AM IST


Save & read from anywhere!

Bookmark stories for easy access on any device or the Swarajya app.

Sign In
 
(Photo By Justin Sullivan/Getty Images)
(Photo By Justin Sullivan/Getty Images)
  • Neither the public nor governments consider passports as a serious obstacle to freedom of movement, though any would-be traveller from Yeman, Afghanistan or Somalia would no doubt argue differently.
  • In the age of heavily restricted migration, passport control seems a natural prerogative of the state. The idea of abolishing passports is almost unthinkable. But in the 20th century, governments considered their “total abolition” as an important goal, and even discussed the issue at several international conferences.

    The first passport conference was held in Paris in 1920, under the auspices of the League of Nations (the predecessor of the United Nations). Part of the Committee on Communication and Transit’s aim was to restore the pre-war regime of freedom of movement.

    Indeed, for much of the 19th century, as an International Labour Organisation report stated in 1922:

    Migration was generally speaking, unhindered and each emigrant could decide on the time of his departure, his arrival or his return, to suit his own convenience.

    But the First World War brought harsh restrictions on freedom of movement.

    In 1914, warring states of France, Germany and Italy were the first to make passports mandatory, a measure rapidly followed by others, including the neutral states of Spain, Denmark and Switzerland.

    At the end of the war, the regime of obligatory passports was widespread. The 1919 Treaty of Versailles, which established the League of Nations, stipulated that member states commit to “secure and maintain freedom of communications and of transit.”

    Fences are easier to build than to dismantle. The 1920 Paris conference recognised that restrictions on freedom of movement affect “personal relations between the peoples of various countries” and “constitute a serious obstacle to the resumption of normal intercourse and to the economic recovery of the world”.

    But its delegates also assumed that security concerns prevented, for the time being, the total abolition of restrictions and the complete return to pre-war conditions which the Conference hopes, nevertheless, to see gradually re-established in the near future.

    To facilitate freedom of movement, participants agreed instead to establish a uniform, international passport, issued for a single journey or for a period of two years. This is how we ended up with the format of the passports we use today.

    Participants also decided to abolish exit visas and decrease the cost of entry visas.

    Close But No Cigar

    During the conferences that followed, several resolutions again highlighted the goal of abolishing passports, but concluded that the time was not yet right. In 1924, the International Conference of Emigration and Immigration in Rome maintained that “the necessity of obtaining passports should be abolished as soon as possible” but in the meantime advocated other measures to facilitate travel. These measures included an increase in the number of offices delivering passports, allowing emigrants to save time and money.

    In Geneva in 1926, Polish delegate, Franciszek Sokal, opened proceedings by bluntly asking the parties to adopt “as a general rule that all state members of the League of Nations should abolish passports”.

    At that time, passports and visas were still regarded as a serious obstacle to freedom of movement, as a Mr Junod from the International Chamber of Commerce said:

    Could not the conference adopt a resolution contemplating the abolition of passports at the earliest possible date? Public opinion would regard this as a step in the right direction.

    But by then, most governments had already adopted the uniform passport and some of them saw it as an important document that was meant to protect emigrants. As the Italian delegate reminded the conference that conditions had changed after the war and the passport was “particularly necessary as an identification document for workers and their families; it provided them with the protection they needed, enabled them to obtain permits of sojourn”.

    Another delegate alluded to the Soviet Union when he refused to restore the pre-war regime. He said:

    Conditions had changed so much since the war that everyone had to take into consideration a good many things they could formerly ignore.

    Discussions about passport abolition resumed after the Second World War.

    In 1947, the first problem considered at an expert meeting preparing for the UN World Conference on Passports and Frontier Formalities was “the possibility of a return to the regime which existed before 1914 involving as a general rule the abolition of any requirement that travellers should carry passports”.

    But delegates ultimately decided that a return to a passport-free world could only happen alongside a return to the global conditions that prevailed before the start of the First World War. By 1947, that was a distant dream. The experts advised instead a series of bilateral and multilateral agreements to attain this goal.

    World leaders were still talking about banning passports as late as 1963, when the UN Conference on International Travel and Tourism recognised “the desirability, from both an economic and social point, of progressively freer international travel”. Once again, it was estimated that “it is not feasible to recommend the abolition of passports on a world-wide basis”.

    Now, neither the public nor governments consider passports as a serious obstacle to freedom of movement, though any would-be traveller from Yemen, Afghanistan or Somalia would no doubt argue differently.

    It takes less than a century, it seems, to see the absence of freedom as a natural condition.

    This piece was first published on the Foundation for Economic Education and has been republished here with permission.


    Save & read from anywhere!

    Bookmark stories for easy access on any device or the Swarajya app.

    Sign In

    Speranta Dumitru is an Associate Professor of Political Science at the University of Paris Descartes. She is a laureate of Foundation for Social Sciences and held a Chair on Social Ethics at CERLIS, CNRS.

    Tags
  • United Nations
  • soviet union
  • First World War
  • Second World War
  • Pasports
  • International Labour Organisation
  • League of Nations
  • Treaty of Versailles
  • International Chamber of Commerce
  • whatsapp

    Join our WhatsApp channel - no spam, only sharp analysis


    Introducing ElectionsHQ + 50 Ground Reports Project


     

    The 2024 elections might seem easy to guess, but there are some important questions that shouldn't be missed.

     

    Do freebies still sway voters? Do people prioritise infrastructure when voting? How will Punjab vote?

     

    The answers to these questions provide great insights into where we, as a country, are headed in the years to come.

     

    Swarajya is starting a project with an aim to do 50 solid ground stories and a smart commentary service on WhatsApp, a one-of-a-kind. We'd love your support during this election season.

     

    Click below to contribute.

    Get Swarajya in your inbox.


    • Afghanistan+93
    • Albania+355
    • Algeria+213
    • Andorra+376
    • Angola+244
    • Antigua and Barbuda+1268
    • Argentina+54
    • Armenia+374
    • Aruba+297
    • Australia+61
    • Austria+43
    • Azerbaijan+994
    • Bahamas+1242
    • Bahrain+973
    • Bangladesh+880
    • Barbados+1246
    • Belarus+375
    • Belgium+32
    • Belize+501
    • Benin+229
    • Bhutan+975
    • Bolivia+591
    • Bosnia and Herzegovina+387
    • Botswana+267
    • Brazil+55
    • British Indian Ocean Territory+246
    • Brunei+673
    • Bulgaria+359
    • Burkina Faso+226
    • Burundi+257
    • Cambodia+855
    • Cameroon+237
    • Canada+1
    • Cape Verde+238
    • Caribbean Netherlands+599
    • Central African Republic+236
    • Chad+235
    • Chile+56
    • China+86
    • Colombia+57
    • Comoros+269
    • Congo+243
    • Congo+242
    • Costa Rica+506
    • Côte d'Ivoire+225
    • Croatia+385
    • Cuba+53
    • Curaçao+599
    • Cyprus+357
    • Czech Republic+420
    • Denmark+45
    • Djibouti+253
    • Dominica+1767
    • Dominican Republic+1
    • Ecuador+593
    • Egypt+20
    • El Salvador+503
    • Equatorial Guinea+240
    • Eritrea+291
    • Estonia+372
    • Ethiopia+251
    • Fiji+679
    • Finland+358
    • France+33
    • French Guiana+594
    • French Polynesia+689
    • Gabon+241
    • Gambia+220
    • Georgia+995
    • Germany+49
    • Ghana+233
    • Greece+30
    • Grenada+1473
    • Guadeloupe+590
    • Guam+1671
    • Guatemala+502
    • Guinea+224
    • Guinea-Bissau+245
    • Guyana+592
    • Haiti+509
    • Honduras+504
    • Hong Kong+852
    • Hungary+36
    • Iceland+354
    • India+91
    • Indonesia+62
    • Iran+98
    • Iraq+964
    • Ireland+353
    • Israel+972
    • Italy+39
    • Jamaica+1876
    • Japan+81
    • Jordan+962
    • Kazakhstan+7
    • Kenya+254
    • Kiribati+686
    • Kosovo+383
    • Kuwait+965
    • Kyrgyzstan+996
    • Laos+856
    • Latvia+371
    • Lebanon+961
    • Lesotho+266
    • Liberia+231
    • Libya+218
    • Liechtenstein+423
    • Lithuania+370
    • Luxembourg+352
    • Macau+853
    • Macedonia+389
    • Madagascar+261
    • Malawi+265
    • Malaysia+60
    • Maldives+960
    • Mali+223
    • Malta+356
    • Marshall Islands+692
    • Martinique+596
    • Mauritania+222
    • Mauritius+230
    • Mexico+52
    • Micronesia+691
    • Moldova+373
    • Monaco+377
    • Mongolia+976
    • Montenegro+382
    • Morocco+212
    • Mozambique+258
    • Myanmar+95
    • Namibia+264
    • Nauru+674
    • Nepal+977
    • Netherlands+31
    • New Caledonia+687
    • New Zealand+64
    • Nicaragua+505
    • Niger+227
    • Nigeria+234
    • North Korea+850
    • Norway+47
    • Oman+968
    • Pakistan+92
    • Palau+680
    • Palestine+970
    • Panama+507
    • Papua New Guinea+675
    • Paraguay+595
    • Peru+51
    • Philippines+63
    • Poland+48
    • Portugal+351
    • Puerto Rico+1
    • Qatar+974
    • Réunion+262
    • Romania+40
    • Russia+7
    • Rwanda+250
    • Saint Kitts and Nevis+1869
    • Saint Lucia+1758
    • Saint Vincent and the Grenadines+1784
    • Samoa+685
    • San Marino+378
    • São Tomé and Príncipe+239
    • Saudi Arabia+966
    • Senegal+221
    • Serbia+381
    • Seychelles+248
    • Sierra Leone+232
    • Singapore+65
    • Slovakia+421
    • Slovenia+386
    • Solomon Islands+677
    • Somalia+252
    • South Africa+27
    • South Korea+82
    • South Sudan+211
    • Spain+34
    • Sri Lanka+94
    • Sudan+249
    • Suriname+597
    • Swaziland+268
    • Sweden+46
    • Switzerland+41
    • Syria+963
    • Taiwan+886
    • Tajikistan+992
    • Tanzania+255
    • Thailand+66
    • Timor-Leste+670
    • Togo+228
    • Tonga+676
    • Trinidad and Tobago+1868
    • Tunisia+216
    • Turkey+90
    • Turkmenistan+993
    • Tuvalu+688
    • Uganda+256
    • Ukraine+380
    • United Arab Emirates+971
    • United Kingdom+44
    • United States+1
    • Uruguay+598
    • Uzbekistan+998
    • Vanuatu+678
    • Vatican City+39
    • Venezuela+58
    • Vietnam+84
    • Yemen+967
    • Zambia+260
    • Zimbabwe+263
    States

    Magazine


    If BJP wins '2024' it becomes India's natural party of governance. What next?

    Politics

    Modi Campaign Tracker

    PM Modi Dashboard: PM interacts with booth workers in Kerala, calls them beyond compare, disciplined, sacrificing, and hardworking

    Anmol Jain
    14h

    Uttar Pradesh 2009: BJP's Humiliation; Congress' Moment In The Sun

    Venu Gopal Narayanan
    15h

    Recalling The 2009 Varanasi Showdown: Don Mukhtar Ansari's Near-Victory Against BJP's Murli Manohar Joshi

    Venu Gopal Narayanan
    1d

    Economy

    CEA V Anantha Nageswaran (on the left) and French Economist Thomas Picketty (on the right)

    'Could Have Spared Ourselves The Tedium Of Ploughing Through 85 Pages': CEA Anantha Nageswaran Rebuts Inequality Report On India

    Swarajya Staff
    4d

    This Category In E-Commerce Can Fuel India's Journey To $1 Trillion In Exports By 2030

    Tirumala Venkatesh
    13d

    Vietnam And Bangladesh Are Not Outpacing India — Here Are The Facts

    Abhishek Kumar
    20d

    Defence

    India building infrastructure at a brisk pace along the China border.

    New Road To Ladakh: Chinese Aggression On LAC Hasn't Dampened India's Resolve To Build Border Infrastructure At Feverish Pace

    Ujjwal Shrotryia
    4d

    Explained: All About China's New KJ-600 Aircraft-Carrier Capable 'Eye-In-The-Sky' Radar Plane

    Ujjwal Shrotryia
    5d

    The Tejas Success Story In One Picture

    Ujjwal Shrotryia
    13d

    World

    Chinese President Xi Jinping. (Illustration: Swarajya Magazine)

    Explained: Strategic Support Force That Chinese President Xi Is Betting On To Win Wars

    Ujjwal Shrotryia
    2d

    Why India Must Learn To Suck It Up With Uncle Sam For 10 More Years

    R Jagannathan
    3d

    India Is Reimagining International Institutions For The Emerging World Order

    Nimish Joshi
    6d

    Culture

    M S Subbulakshmi.

    T M Krishna Can No Longer Be Silent, Owes An Apology To M S Subbulakshmi's Family

    K Balakumar
    18h

    Swatantrya Veer Savarkar - The Pole Star  

    Shefali Vaidya
    4d

    Holi In Haridwar: New Trivendra Singh Rawat, New Slogan, New Beginning

    Sumati Mehrishi
    5d

    infrastructure


    Amit Mishra
    1

    Steering Back Onto Track: RRTS Derailment Explained

    2 Mins Read
    Ankit Saxena
    2

    Goa's New Airport Has Captured Nearly Half Of State's Air Traffic In Its First Year — A Ground Report

    8 Mins Read
    Ujjwal Shrotryia
    3

    New Road To Ladakh: Chinese Aggression On LAC Hasn't Dampened India's Resolve To Build Border Infrastructure At Feverish Pace

    4 Mins Read
    Ankit Saxena
    4

    How Goa's Sea Bridges And Elevated Roads Are Reshaping The State's Roadway Map

    6 Mins Read