Insta
Supreme Court To Deliver Verdict On Permanent Commission For Women Officers In Indian Navy Today
IANS
Mar 17, 2020, 08:16 AM | Updated 08:16 AM IST
Save & read from anywhere!
Bookmark stories for easy access on any device or the Swarajya app.
The Supreme Court will deliver judgment on permanent commission for women officers in the navy on Tuesday (17 March). It follows a verdict by the apex court in favour of permanent commission for women officer in the army.
The Bench, headed by Justice D Y Chandrachud, will deliver the judgement at 10.30 am. The women officers had contended in the apex court that the gender-based classification was always justified by governments across the world with inane explanations, and they would do anything to justify their discriminatory behaviour.
Aishwarya Bhati, counsel for women officers seeking permanent commission in navy, said her client's case was similar to the one propounded by the Babita Puniya judgement, where the apex court directed the Centre to grant permanent commission to all women officers in three months.
The petitioner was commissioned in the navy on 6 August 2007, in the JAG branch and is the only SSC JAG branch officer.
"Both the navy as well as the army wanted to apply the policy of grant of permanent commission prospectively, excluding the serving women officers," Bhati said.
She contended before the court that her client's application was rejected because she was prior to the policy, but the applications of her male colleagues were accepted.
Bhati said inherent discrimination was prevalent in the working of administrations and supported justifications offered to prevent women from attaining permanent commission, seniority in cases of national security, and reduction of number for direct recruitment.
The lawyer said slightly different shade of reasons given to deny the benefit of the policy of permanent commission to serving women officers of the navy bear an uncanny resemblance to the issues of mindset and stereotypes, in the case of the women officers of the army.
"These misconceived reasons are being masqueraded as organisational issues to scuttle and deny the right of rationality, equality, and equal opportunities and deserve to be rejected completely and outrightly, in the same manner," she told the court.
(This story has been published from a wire agency feed without modifications to the text. Only the headline has been changed.)
Save & read from anywhere!
Bookmark stories for easy access on any device or the Swarajya app.
Support Swarajya's 50 Ground Reports Project & Sponsor A Story
Every general election Swarajya does a 50 ground reports project.
Aimed only at serious readers and those who appreciate the nuances of political undercurrents, the project provides a sense of India's electoral landscape. As you know, these reports are produced after considerable investment of travel, time and effort on the ground.
This time too we've kicked off the project in style and have covered over 30 constituencies already. If you're someone who appreciates such work and have enjoyed our coverage please consider sponsoring a ground report for just Rs 2999 to Rs 19,999 - it goes a long way in helping us produce more quality reportage.
You can also back this project by becoming a subscriber for as little as Rs 999 - so do click on this links and choose a plan that suits you and back us.
Click below to contribute.