Politics
Hijab Row: Supreme Court To Deliver Judgement On Petitions Challenging Karnataka HC Verdict Upholding Right Of Educational Institutions To Prescribe Uniforms
Swarajya Staff
Oct 13, 2022, 10:01 AM | Updated 10:01 AM IST
Save & read from anywhere!
Bookmark stories for easy access on any device or the Swarajya app.
The Supreme Court today (Oct 13) will deliver its judgement on a batch of petitions challenging the Karnataka High Court verdict upholding the right of educational institutions to prescribe wearing of uniforms in schools and pre-university colleges under provisions of the Karnataka Education Act, 1983.
A bench of Justices Hemant Gupta and Sudhanshu Dhulia had on September 22 reserved its judgement after hearing arguments for 10 days in the matter.
On March 15, the Karnataka high court ruled that prescription of school uniform does not violate either the right to freedom of speech and expression under Article 19(1) (a) or the right to privacy under Article 21 of the Constitution, and the restriction against wearing of hijab in educational institutions is only a reasonable restriction constitutionally permissible, which the students cannot object to.
The courts also ruled that wearing of hijab by Muslim women does not constitute an essential religious practice in Islamic faith and it is not protected under the right to freedom of religion guaranteed under Article 25 of the Constitution of India.
The judgment was delivered by a three-judge bench comprising Chief Justice Ritu Raj Awasthi, Justice Krishna S. Dixit and Justice J.M. Khazi while rejecting all the petitions filed by nine Muslim girl students studying in two government pre-university colleges in Udupi district.
Appealing against HC verdict, the Muslim students approached the SC saying the “right to wear hijab comes under the ambit of ‘expression’ and is thus protected under Article 19(1)(a) of the Constitution”. The petitioners argued before the SC that HC should not have applied the ‘Essential Religious Practices Test’.
The Karnataka government was represented by Solicitor General Tushar Mehta and Advocate General Prabhuling K Navadgi.
The state government, for its part, argued that till 2021, no student was wearing hijab but a movement was launched by the now-banned Islamist outfit PFI on social media with a design to create social unrest, forcing it to intervene into the matter by issuing the order.
Save & read from anywhere!
Bookmark stories for easy access on any device or the Swarajya app.
Support Swarajya's 50 Ground Reports Project & Sponsor A Story
Every general election Swarajya does a 50 ground reports project.
Aimed only at serious readers and those who appreciate the nuances of political undercurrents, the project provides a sense of India's electoral landscape. As you know, these reports are produced after considerable investment of travel, time and effort on the ground.
This time too we've kicked off the project in style and have covered over 30 constituencies already. If you're someone who appreciates such work and have enjoyed our coverage please consider sponsoring a ground report for just Rs 2999 to Rs 19,999 - it goes a long way in helping us produce more quality reportage.
You can also back this project by becoming a subscriber for as little as Rs 999 - so do click on this links and choose a plan that suits you and back us.
Click below to contribute.