Politics
This Is How They Waste SC's Precious Time: Rijiju On N Ram, Mahua Moitra And Others Moving Apex Court Against BBC Documentary 'Ban'
Swarajya Staff
Jan 30, 2023, 02:28 PM | Updated 02:32 PM IST
Save & read from anywhere!
Bookmark stories for easy access on any device or the Swarajya app.
Union Law Minister Kiren Rijiju on Monday (27 January) slammed the petitioners challenging Centre's alleged decision to ban controversial BBC documentary on PM Modi.
The Law Minister said that the petitioners were "wasting the precious time" of the Supreme Court, even as thousand of common citizens are "seeking dates" from the apex Court for justice.
The petitioners included journalist N Ram, advocate Prashant Bhushan and TMC MP Mahua Moitra among others.
"This is how they waste the precious time of Hon'ble Supreme Court where thousands of common citizens are waiting and seeking dates for Justice," Rijiju tweeted.
This is how they waste the precious time of Hon'ble Supreme Court where thousands of common citizens are waiting and seeking dates for Justice. https://t.co/5kouG8Px2K
— Kiren Rijiju (@KirenRijiju) January 30, 2023
The Supreme Court on Monday agreed to hear pleas challenging the Centre's decision to block a BBC documentary on the 2002 Gujarat riots.
A bench comprising Chief Justice D Y Chandrachud and justices P S Narasimha and J B Pardiwala took note of the submissions of lawyer M L Sharma and senior advocate C U Singh seeking urgent listing of their separate PILs on the issue.
Sharma mentioned the petition before Chief Justice of India DY Chandrachud for urgent listing. CJI agreed to list the matter next Monday.
Senior advocate C U Singh mentioned a separate plea on the issue filed by veteran journalist N Ram and activist lawyer Prashant Bhushan.
Singh said that Centre invoked emergency powers under IT Rules to remove the links about the documentary from social media.
He mentioned how the tweets by Ram and Bhushan were deleted allegedly by using emergency powers. He also said that students in Ajmer were rusticated for streaming the BBC documentary. 'We will list,' the CJI said, reports Livelaw.
Lawyer Sharma filed the PIL against the Centre's decision to block the documentary, alleging it was 'malafide, arbitrary and unconstitutional'.
The Centre on 21 January had reportedly invoked emergency powers under IT Rules 2021 for blocking multiple YouTube videos and Twitter posts sharing links to the controversial BBC documentary 'India: The Modi Question'.
(With inputs from PTI)
Save & read from anywhere!
Bookmark stories for easy access on any device or the Swarajya app.
Support Swarajya's 50 Ground Reports Project & Sponsor A Story
Every general election Swarajya does a 50 ground reports project.
Aimed only at serious readers and those who appreciate the nuances of political undercurrents, the project provides a sense of India's electoral landscape. As you know, these reports are produced after considerable investment of travel, time and effort on the ground.
This time too we've kicked off the project in style and have covered over 30 constituencies already. If you're someone who appreciates such work and have enjoyed our coverage please consider sponsoring a ground report for just Rs 2999 to Rs 19,999 - it goes a long way in helping us produce more quality reportage.
You can also back this project by becoming a subscriber for as little as Rs 999 - so do click on this links and choose a plan that suits you and back us.
Click below to contribute.