Culture
Devi’s nose ring.
Read the previous report here.
“Tarakanti tiraskari nasabharanabhasura”
She is the one who wears a nose ring that dazzles brighter than the glittering stars.
These stars or group of star, as per traditional commentary on the Sri Lalita Sahasranama, refer to two goddesses — Mangala and Sukla. While Mangala refers to the red planet Mars, Sukla refers to Venus.
In the puranic tradition, both these planets are male deities. But Mangala Chandi is also considered as a goddess worshipped by Mangala. Thereby, Sukla would mean the goddess worshipped by Sukra.
But there is also a tradition, where both these morning stars are considered feminine. And this is the characteristic of a magnificent dharmic ocean like Sanatana Dharma. Or in the words of Niels Bohr, “the opposite of a very ordinary truth is falsehood but the opposite of a magnificent Truth is another one magnificent Truth.”
But her nose ring dazzles in such a way that it even defeats the shining stars of the night sky, and stands out.
This is a living local tradition in Kanyakumari. The goddess here is the meditating virgin goddess. Kumari Goddess is mentioned in the Taittiriya Aranyaka, probably belonging to fourth century BCE; Periplus of the Eryrthraean Sea (60 CE: author unknown) speaks of how those who dedicate their lives to the service of the divine come here and worship the goddess. So the goddess is not only ancient but also pan-Indic.
Local tradition has it that a patriarch of a Nadar family discovered a cobra gem or nagamani. It is a belief that a king cobra that has received a rain drop on Swati nakshatra develops this gem in its hood and when the snake turns 100 , the gem becomes precious and acquires healing and other magical qualities.
The Nadar patriarch handed over the nagamani to the king who in turn offered it to the goddess in the form of a nose ring. The family, which found the nagamani and handed it over to the king was called the Nagamani family. To this day, there are many in the Nadar community of Kanyakumari district who bear the name Nagamani.
This gem in the nose ring of the goddess was said to be quite bright. It is said that sometimes sailors mistook it for either star light or watch tower light and met with disaster in the rock filled seas of Kanyakumari.
It is also said that pirates got attracted by this rare gem and when they tried to loot it, often met with their doom. However, this nose ring was lost in time and the one that the goddess now wears is of recent origin.
That the nose ring of the goddess is brighter than the stars is thus a pervasive sacred imagery that is integral to Hindu mind. Whether it is the so-called folk or classical traditions of religion, it shows how organic and indivisibly interwoven the narratives of Hindu traditions are. This is an aspect that the colonial Indologists, binary-seeking Marxists and colonised Indian scholars could never comprehend.
However, the Tara with whom the great mystic commentator associates this name is Tara the second of the 10 Maha Vidyas. The famous Shaktic scholar S Shankaranarayanan, who was under the dynamic influence of the great Shaktic Vedic seer of modern times Kapali Shastrigal, explains:
As Nila Saraswati, she is also the indestructible eternal word: nitya -vak and Akshara — the sound symbol of consciousness Aum. In fact, Pranava is considered the Taraka Mantra.
Unfortunately, today in popular imagination Tara is mainly associated with Buddhism. In fact, she is considered as a Buddhist goddess whom non-Buddhist Hindus have borrowed.
It should be remembered that it was Tara who was the first woman-divinity to be recognised as having attained Buddhahood in Buddhism. In early Buddhism, the women could attain Arahathood but they could never become Bodhisattva.
Then in the next six births the person was born as a female. At the end of the Jataka, this woman was shown as the one reborn as Ananda, Buddha's chief disciple.
Dr Naomi Appleton, who studies early Indian religions (Vedic, Buddhist and Jain), points out in her study of Jataka stories in Theravada Buddhism:
Now, that is quite easy to understand. Buddhism was constructed during the Victorian and larger parts of colonial period as an intermittent step in evangelism. A strong section of Indologists and evangelists saw Buddhism as "preparatio evangelica" — "as part of God's plan of salvation, more specifically, as a divinely ordained preparation for the Christian gospel”. (Philip C. Almond, The British discovery of Buddhism, Cambridge University Press, 1988, p.137)
Samuel Bael, the nineteenth century Buddhist scholar, in his detailed study of Buddhism stated that but for Buddhism people of India would be under tyranny of priesthood and that it had prepared Indians to receive ‘the higher truth’ that is Christianity.
The missionary he refers to is St Paul. Paul somehow could not come East despite this ‘Divine Plan’. (A Catena of Buddhist Scriptures, Trubner & Co,1871, p.8)
In 2001, this strategy was scaled up and employed in India. Rationalist Sanal Edamaruku exposed this strategy of Buddhism as "Preparation evangelica" when he wrote the following:
It is such a condition of forces against the Dharma exploiting and abusing the Dharma of Bhagwan Buddha against the Sanatana Dharma and Hindu Rashtra, that the Name reminds us of Tara’s Vedic roots.
As against the Theravada Buddhism forbidding women from becoming Buddha, the emergence of Tara as the first Buddhahood attained divine feminine in Buddhism has to be explained.
Clearly, one has to accept the influence and path correction effected by Vedic Dharma on Buddhism.
In this context, it may be pertinent to point out what Prof Miranda Shaw, Buddhist scholar, in her exhaustive study of the Buddhist goddesses of India points out:
Buddhists did not appropriate Tara. On the other hand, the goddess made Buddha Dharma a whole and had her own evolution through Buddhism.
In countries like China and Japan, the strong presence of Tara as feminine Buddhist principle at its highest allowed uninterrupted evolution of the adoration and realisation of the divine feminine. This is Samanvaya in action — Vedic principle of organic growth of sacred-diversity. As Buddhist scholar Prof Lokesh Chandra states, theo-diveristy and bio-diversity go hand in hand.
Yet for colonised Indians, Buddhism was a reformist or worse anti-Vedic movement.
They associate anything good in Indian society and culture with Buddhism and everything deemed wrong and unjust with Vedic Dharma.
When we mediate upon the Name Tarakanti tiraskari nasabharanabhasura let us not forget the contribution that Vedic Dharma made and the course correction that Sanatana Dharma effected on the Dharma of Buddha — removing a chief deficiency.
Let us pray that she sheds path-correcting light through the darkness imposed by the vestiges of colonialism and its derived vested ideological interests that breed hatred through ignorance.
Let her lead us from hatred to love through wisdom and destruction of ignorance.