Selective Outrage: Israel-Palestine Conflict Throws Light On Inconsistencies In Activism For Justice At Home

While there are genuine concerns over the humanitarian conditions in Gaza, it is an unmistakable fact that not all support for Palestine stems from this concern.

Rather than take sides in the ongoing war, this writer aims to highlight the double standards that have been applied over viewing the blazing war between Israel and Palestine and the countless issues encountered and fought over decades by Hindus in India.

There has been an overwhelming swarm of tweets that not only support Palestine, but go so far as to say Israel has no right to exist, having been built, as they claim, upon the depredations of the holy Palestinian lands.

Many of these tweets come even from Indian supporters of Palestine.

The issue, however, lies where historical amnesia and selectivity of justice combine, when fighting for justice.

Indian Hindus have witnessed thousands of years of encroachment. The mosques on the Mathura and Kashi lands (Shahi Idgah and Gyanvapi mosques) and previously the Ayodhya mosque — were built over the depredations of Hindu temples of worship.

There are those who are raising their voice over a 'genocide' in Gaza, claiming that a hostile takeover is under progress, that will lead to the wiping out of an entire population.

Justice for Kashmiri Hindu pandits, on the other hand, remains elusive — even a discussion of it.

The case for the exodus or death of more than one lakh Kashmiri Hindus, out of an estimated population of 1.2 lakh, who have now become refugees in their own land, fall on deaf ears. Only if they had sway over social media, too.

Those subjected to the worst of violence — wiping out of entire neighbourhoods and generations, and whose property was taken over — still wait for justice.

Their cases, though, are deemed too old now for justice. To quote Dr Anand Ranganathan from his book Hindus in Hindu Rashtra:

Similarly, there is unhappiness and anger about Western democracies taking the side of Israel over Palestine. There are demands made of the Indian side, of its government, to take sides, even though India has always propagated a two-state solution and formally accepted the Palestine Liberation Organisation (PLO) as a legitimate authority.

However, when matters discussed earlier, like justice for Kashmiri pandits, is brought up at home, all support for aid for these victims vanish and so does all the will to bring forth justice and the voice against government inaction.

Those in India on the side of Israel are no innocent, too, when it comes to selectivity. Many videos have been shared from universities in the Gaza region where radicalised children can be seen shouting slurs for Jews and believe that it is their god-given duty to exterminate them.

Supporters of Israel can be seen sharing their opinions on how educational institutions in Palestine are indoctrinating students and how harmful this will turn out to be for the future stability and peace of the country.

Hindu religious educational institutions have seen sophisticated and systematic persecution. Grants for these institutions have been delayed, promised scholarships delayed, and funding stopped, until most of these institutions succumbed to financial pressure.

However, religious institutions, such as madrassas, have continued to prosper with massive state funding. Such institutions — have in the past and continue to — indoctrinate students with unsustainable ideas relating to monotheism and intolerance of other cultures.

Videos, like those of compulsory offering of namaz by all students, irrespective of their religion, at some institutions, before education is imparted, or those of young madrassa-going children being made to chop off the head of a cow-shaped cake, can easily be found.

Yet, you would find little to no voice being raised about this issue.

On the other hand, when news related to not persecution but auditing of madrassas’ funds in Uttar Pradesh or that about conversion of madrassas into educational institutes is published, one can see chaos ensue and condemnations pour out.

In countries like Canada and the US, we have seen mass protests, with students coming out in support of Palestine. However, what is also as common is photos of those unwilling to participate being labelled anti-Muslim.

There has been outrage about slogans such as “From the river to the sea, Palestine will be free” used by students. When it comes to slogans such as ‘Humen tumse kya naata…’ or 'Tum kitne Afzal maaroge, har ghar se Afzal nikalega’ glorifying terrorists such as Afzal Guru, there is deafening silence from the proponents of justice, especially on the left.

Everyone is expected to measure up words while speaking so as not to be misunderstood and subsequently stratified — support Israel too much and one may be deemed an anti-Muslim; support Palestine too much and you may just be called a terrorist sympathiser.

In a similar spirit, one can see how the recent calls for genocide of about 80 per cent of a country’s population, made by Udayanidhi Stalin, calling for the eradication of everyone under the fold of the Sanatana Dharma, will be tolerated, but the quoting of Islamic scripture Sahih al-Bukhari 5134 and the Sunan an-Nasa’I 3378 by Nupur Sharma will be called out every time.

Until the majority believes they are majoritarian, they will be told again and again about the Sabarimala Temple entry system, the rituals of the Dharmapuram Adheenam Pattina Pravesam, and the ‘inhumane’ Jalikattu practices or the dangers of Makar Sankranti and Diwali celebrations.

However, silence will be maintained over similar practices in Sedia Gestatoria, Moharram, Christmas, and New Year celebrations.

Aurangzeb, who killed millions of Hindus, is glorified again and again while Hamas is called a terror outfit.

We have seen every media outlet, and USCIRF, cover the burning of the mosque and the killing of the Imam — both tragic events that must be investigated, but how many times have we heard about Abhishek, 22 and the breadwinner of a family of six, who was shot through with bullets trying to protect pregnant women and whose head was chopped off his body, as he lay on the street dying?

Or the case of stones being pelted at a Vishwa Hindu Parishad rally and their cars being burnt? In fact, this country has normalised stone pelting when it comes to celebrating Ram Navami and Ganesh Chaturthi, the recent events in Surat only adding to the mix. There is a recurring theme to this.

Equal treatment is demanded abroad but Uniform Civil Code at home is not supported; property rights and the right to exist are demanded for those suffering abroad, but there is a hush when it comes to protesting against Waqf.

While everyone wants to talk about the war, no one wants to talk about the slaughter of protesters outside the parliament in 1966.

When the protesters demand that the Indian state should lend an accepting hand towards Palestinian masses, they forget that they are the ones who protested the citizenship laws that would grant citizenship to persecuted minorities from neighbouring states!

It is as if, someone wanting for not all to be equals, is demanding equality.

Finally, this has not been an attempt at whataboutery or to connect two irrelated things: a reader fighting for justice for victims of injustice abroad should be able to correlate these facts well.

Rather, it has been an attempt to put history into perspective and implore the reader to reflect on whether justice at home is not as important, if not more, as justice outside, and that while voices are raised in support of foreign populations, the same treatment should be afforded to victims at home too.