Bhoomi Pooja Is Secular; The Monstrosity Is Dravidianist Opposition To It

On 16 July 2022, a video of S Senthilkumar, a Member of Parliament (MP) from the Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam (DMK), representing Dharmapuri Parliamentary constituency of Tamil Nadu, went viral. In that, he was seen shouting angrily at the assembled Government officials over a bhoomi pooja for a road construction work.

He was seen asking why a Christian priest and a Muslim Imam along with atheists were not asked to come and be represented in their own way at the function and why there was sectarianism. He also was seen telling that such 'RSS way' of doing things could not be tolerated in the Dravidian rule.

At the superficial level this may look correct and hyper-secular. But once one sees in detail, the argument is shallow and reeks of hypocrisy that characterises Dravidianist politics.

Hindu bhoomi pooja is based on the axiom that the Bhoomi or the Earth is a living entity that is to be venerated. This is a stand that resonates with a sound line of scientific thinking. It has ecological values at its core.

समुद्रवसने देवि पर्वतस्तनमण्डले ।

विष्णुपत्नि नमस्तुभ्यं पादस्पर्शं क्षमस्वमे ॥

Samudra-Vasane Devi Parvata-Stana-Mannddale

Vissnnu-Patni Namas-Tubhyam Paada-Sparsham Kssamasva-Me

This Vedic imagery of Mother Earth wearing the oceans, a very Vedic image, is also part and parcel of the famous hymn for Mother Tamil composed by Manonmaniam Sundranar, as pointed out Sri Sankaranarayanan (Jataayu) a scholar of classic Tamil and Sanskrit.

This is because the Vedic Sanatana nature of Indian culture is an existential reality. Despite the artificial construction of Dravidianism, when one has to go to authentic Tamil values, then he or she naturally falls back on to the very same Sanatana Dharma.

Today, with concepts like the Gaia hypothesis, modern science does not see the sacredising nature as against secularism. It does not necessitate an extra-cosmic God. The inherent divinity of nature is very much scientific. Any person with basic human civilisational sensibility, who has comprehension of ecology, would understand that the Hindu bhoomi pooja, which is Vedic and in tune with ecological values, does not violate secularism.

What about the atheists?

In fact, a Vedic ceremony does not demand a belief from any person. It only imparts the sense of Divine which is based on the principle of co-creation – a very important value needed in the modern context of ecological sensitivity.

Pari Padal, that speaks of the Vedic Yajna, speaks how Vishnu is the very process itself and how witnessing that even those who adhere to a materialist worldview feel the Divine.

At the same time, asking a Christian or an Islamic priest to conduct a bhoomi pooja would be either violating secularism or asking them to abandon their core belief system or both.

Unlike Hindu Dharma that sees the Nature as inherently divine, Christian and Islamic beliefs demand an extra-cosmic personal creator. So, if one brings in a Christian priest and a Muslim Imam they not only cannot consider the Earth divine but rather at best their prayers may be thanksgiving to the creator-gods for the supremacy of humanity over nature – which is not only anti-secular and anti-science but also anti-ecological.

One can be sure that the current planetary crisis definitely makes the spiritual savants in these religions rethink their beliefs and reorient themselves more towards the Divine being immanent in all nature rather than being a monopolistic god -a projection of human megalomania- who sits above the heavens and judges the humans a species that live in a limited wink on an Earth which itself is in an insignificant speck of the universe.

One cannot and should not rule out the ability of human spirituality to develop such rituals in their own religious contexts but unfortunately that time has not come yet. Acceptance of Hindu bhoomi pooja can actually be a proper way of accelerating such evolution, rather than indulgence of competitive tokenism which can only be detrimental to the collective evolution of all religions towards an enlightened spirituality.

Barely three years after India's independence, a great Parsi born scholar of Indian culture and world history made an important prediction.

What the nation witnessed in the video of the DMK MP humiliating the conductor of pooja and threatening the government official, is exactly that – a demonstration of mediocrity and monstrosity.