Swarajya Logo

Politics

J&K Needs Governor’s Rule And A Return To Order Before Political Solutions

  • What political solution can you try for? And who should you talk to, when so-called leaders are running for cover and operating from hideouts.
  • Perhaps the best solution for Jammu and Kashmir right now would be to impose governor’s rule after suspending the assembly, restore calm, and then reopen a dialogue process.

R JagannathanAug 23, 2016, 04:43 PM | Updated 04:43 PM IST
Jammu’s situation today

Jammu’s situation today


One of the nonsensical statements being repeated time and again in the context of the current situation in Jammu & Kashmir is that we need a “political solution” to the problem. Former Chief Minister Omar Abdullah said this when he met the President the other day, and everybody, from Congress to the J&K Chief Minister, is talking the same language.

All of them forget one simple thing: there can be no political solution when the state is in retreat. Over the last few days, in order to avoid further clashes with violent protestors, including jihadis, the police have literally abandoned their jobs in four South Kashmir districts.

A Times of India report today (23 August) says that in these four districts (Pulwama, Shopian, Anantnag, and Kulgam), only three out of 36 police stations are functioning. The places “have descended into anarchy with hundreds and thousands holding ‘azaadi’ rallies almost daily.

Another story by the same newspaper quotes J&K cops as saying that the government has “abandoned us”, leaving them to the mercy of the jihadi elements that have targeted policemen and police stations and threatened their families in order to get them to desert.

A CID officer quoted in the story shared this grim tale :

“In the 2010 violence, 48 houses of cops were razed. Over 1,400 were injured. It’s happening all over again. A head constable was going home to Sopore and was stopped by a group of men in Wadora. They found his uniform in his bag and broke both his hands and legs.”

While the governments – both centre and states – need to get their act together fast, it makes no sense to talk about political solutions when jihadis are ruling the streets. The question of a dialogue comes only after government forces reclaim the streets – which is a far cry. What political solution can you try for? And who should you talk to, when so-called leaders are running for cover and operating from hideouts. The Hurriyat is a paper tiger, and real power now rests with the jihadi mob.


Since they are talking about political solutions, why don’t Messrs Ghulam Nabi Azad and Omar Abdullah meet the militants and separatists to find out what they want and convey it to the government? The state government headed by Mehbooba Mufti should serve as the real interlocutor in this dialogue.

The simple reality is this:

You can’t talk when you have lost ground. You have to gain the upper hand before talks, or else you will fail.

You can talk only with people who are willing to abandon the gun. Hands that hold guns and slay or maim policemen and law enforcers will not be extended for peace.

You have to rebuild police morale, and if this means more state violence, so be it. We should not shy away from a confrontation that is thrust on us.

Perhaps the best solution right now is to impose governor’s rule after suspending the assembly, restore calm, and then reopen a dialogue process. Maybe, the Mufti government has lost the will to rule.

Join our WhatsApp channel - no spam, only sharp analysis