Science
Prof Thanu Padmanabhan
A dedication in a book can sometimes bring out the innermost yearnings of the author. The book had an interesting title – After the first three minutes – the story of our universe, Cambridge University Press, 1998. Coming two decades and a year after the perennial classic The First Three Minutes, written by physicist Steven Weinberg, this book about the cosmic after-story after the first three minutes had been written by an Indian physicist – Thanu Padmanabhan.
Padmanabhan was with the Inter-University Centre for Astronomy and Astrophysics (IUCCAA) at Pune - one of those institutions that make an Indian proud.
In the last chapter on open questions, Dr. Padmanabhan brought out the question of aesthetics. Physicists building cosmological models also look for aesthetics in their models and not without reason:
But post-1992, models have been ‘quite unpleasing’ on the aesthetic front. Even the conventional cosmological model which Padmanabhan adheres to in the book, ‘predicts a singularity at some finite time in the past’, which ‘is probably the most unaesthetic feature any theory can have!’ But it has explanatory power in terms of observed phenomenon like for example, the microwave background radiation.
One is reminded here, of the argument of Sabine Hossenfelder, as to how aesthetics could actually lead physicists away from truth and Michio Kaku’s partial acceptance and rejection of this stand. But that would be again two decades later.
This book provides an excellent walk through the history of science in a non-Eurocentric way. It also highlights Indian achievements. There are no exaggerations and the book makes the reader realise how science is a common heritage that unites all humanity, even as it respects cultural diversity. There is no aversion-filled rhetorical claim, like ‘the West stole calculus’ etc. Instead, there is a detailed explanation of what actually the Kerala school of mathematics achieved. Here is an excerpt:
This book forms a narrative of the evolution of various sciences. It is also modular – that is, each ‘module’ can be read independently. There are box items which highlight the important points. All this make it a must-read for every lover of science-history as well as every student of Indian history.
'History of science' is a neglected area in our teaching of history. It will be really a tribute to the physicist if this book is used by NCERT in developing its curriculum.
Consider just these excerpts:
One wonders what a great social scientist the astrophysicist would have made. He points out a core Gita vision: at once the basic urge in all religious movements (and note he includes Marxism in that) comes from a need to achieve happiness and if genuine, even through Marxism you ultimately come to Krishna.
The last line defines it: ‘Real Gods don’t feel insecure if you tell them they do not exist.’ That should define the Gods and Goddesses of Sanatana Dharma. Otherwise, in what other culture can you see ‘ninthaa’—scolding and disrespecting with bhakti—become a form of stuti, worship? His essay on Gita definitely is an important classic and should deserve as much respect among Hindus as his science works deserves in the physics community.
Today, that daughter is also an astrophysicist. Perhaps she may come out with an updated version of After the First Three Minutes with the latest discoveries and theoretical models – as a befitting tribute to her father whose work and life have made all Indians proud as has his sudden demise made us all deeply sad.