Swarajya Logo
Swarajya Logo
Politics States Economy Society Business Culture Infra Defence World Books Ideas Science Technology Heritage Archives Legal Movies Sports
  • Our Views
    Politics States Economy Society Business Culture Infra Defence World Books Ideas Science Technology Heritage Archives Legal Movies Sports
  • Magazine
  • Store

About Swarajya

Swarajya is a publication by Kovai Media Private Limited.

Swarajya - a big tent for liberal right of centre discourse that reaches out, engages and caters to the new India.

editor@swarajyamag.com

Useful Links

  • About Us
  • Subscriptions Support
  • Editorial Philosophy
  • Press Kit
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Code of Conduct
  • Plagiarism Policy
  • Refund & Cancellation Policy

Useful Links

  • About Us
  • Subscriptions Support
  • Editorial Philosophy
  • Press Kit
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Code of Conduct
  • Plagiarism Policy
  • Refund & Cancellation Policy

Participate

  • Contact Us
  • Write for us
  • Style Guide
  • Jobs

Stay Connected

  • Artboard 2 Copy 6Created with Sketch.
    Artboard 2 Copy 10Created with Sketch.
    Artboard 2 Copy 7Created with Sketch.
    Artboard 2 Copy 9Created with Sketch.
  • Andriod Logo
  • IOS Logo

Ideas

My Differences With Justice A P Shah On His Views On Nationalism And Intolerance

V Anantha NageswaranThursday, April 27, 2017 1:30 pm IST
Independence Day, 1960 (Central Press/Getty Images) 
Independence Day, 1960 (Central Press/Getty Images) 
Independence Day, 1960 (Central Press/Getty Images) 
  • Unlike what Justice Shah claims, nationalism is not outmoded
  • A good friend had forwarded me the full text of A P Shah’s M N Roy Memorial Lecture. You can find it here. The PDF file of the speech is here.

    Overall, it was a good lecture. I understand the need for someone of his stature to raise his voice against nascent signs of intolerance and suppression of dissent in insidious ways. That is very much the need.

    However, I do have some differences – big and small.

    How then did M N Roy understand nationalism? Nationalism was representative of the desires and ambitions of a group of people within a certain geographical area, as opposed to people uniting on the basis of class. Nationalism thus emphasised the placing of one’s country’s interest over the interest of the rest of the world. There was a time in the 19th century, when countries were still isolated from each other, when nationalism was a historic necessity, under whose banner people came together and humanity progressed. However, he believed, it had now become a selfish, narrow-minded “antiquated cult”, and the world should progress towards internationalism and international cooperation.  

    Nationalism in the context of the rise of China and Pakistan, the manner of their rise, their systematic and persistent hostility to India combined with their use of the social media and other pecuniary motivations, is not outmoded. Unfortunately, that is also going to give rise to inevitable restrictions on the concept of ‘benefit of doubt’ to spontaneous, agenda-less dissent.

    In other words, Indians have to accept certain (that can be defined) restrictions in their exercise of fundamental liberties. The state machinery will try to take advantage of the situation to place restrictions on domestic political dissent. But, courts, civil society and the media should and would play the role of ‘checks and balance’.

    In any case, Justice A P Shah seems alive to that risk.

    While discussing the declaration made by the President of the Hindu Maha Sabha that “the majority is the nation”, Roy said that it sounds quite in “tune with formal democracy”, but in reality “particularly in the prevailing atmosphere of Indian politics, it means that in a nationally free India the Muslims, constituting nearly one-third of the population, will have no freedom.

    If some sections constituted one-third and hence had to be accepted as an integral part of India – a very fair point – then it is not consistent with preferential treatment as minorities. The state cannot mandate that they shall have the first claim on India and that they be exempt from Right to Education (RTE) provisions, for example. One cannot have the cake and eat it too.

    But, the speech does leave a feeling of deliberate incompleteness when it talks of how a group of twenty-something students of a university could be tried for charges of sedition for doing what the students in a campus would do.

    More than 90 years later, however, we are still grappling with the fact that the crime of sedition was invoked against a group of 20-something university students for doing what students in a campus should feel entitled to do – raise slogans, debate, disagree, and challenge each other on complex, political issues that face the nation today.      

    Clearly, the state should have had the nous to separate slogan-shouting from explicit anti-national activities. At the same time, the learned Justice should have noted that the shoe is on the other foot too when it comes to the charge of intolerance. The students prevented and still do prevent alternate points of view.

    If nationalism cannot be compelled – and I agree with that without qualification – then is it justifiable that anti-nationalism can be compelled on national soil as some sections of the society want?

    If voluntary groups of people – like students – can resort to violence (in America, now left-liberal students even consider words as violence) to stop alternative points of view, then it becomes that much more untenable for critics to blame the state alone for resorting to violence on which it is supposed to have a monopoly!

    The speech would have been more complete had he also acknowledged the special circumstances that India finds itself in – an assertive and threatening China and its poodle Pakistan, the global rise of Islamic terrorism, Naxals and Maoists and the exploitation of these separatist tendencies by Christian missionaries – that places the state and the army in a uniquely difficult position, etc.

    Some law and order excesses would be inevitable in such situations and they should be redressed and addressed. That said, they do not negate nor nullify the need for vigilance by the state. That would be a very naive call.

    Kamal Hassan in his movie, Nayakan asks the question of who should stop first. That applies here.

    M N Roy’s so-called and apparent context-free commitment to certain ideals definitely had a context. Anyone who claims that they were not influenced by the context in which they lived is lying. Similarly, any message that does not take into account the context in delivering eternal homilies is an incomplete one.

    Indeed, all those who speak pejoratively of nationalism are able to do so only within the sanctuary offered by certain nations. That they cannot do so in all nations is a comprehensive rejection of their rejection of nationalism.

    Finally, both at a micro-level – families, small groups and communities – and at the national level, compulsion is usually counter-productive. So, I completely agree with this part of the speech where he quotes Pratap Bhanu Mehta.

    Pratap Bhanu Mehta points out, the order fails to understand a distinction fundamental to liberal democracy – everything that is desirable or makes for a better citizen does not, and should not, be made compulsory. In fact, making something compulsory undermines the very meaning of that action and the respect that is normally accorded to it.

    This piece was first published on Jeevatma and has been republished here with permission.

    Tags
    nationalism
    Economic reforms
    Sedition
    Justice A P Shah
    Anti-nationalism

    Comments ↓

    An Appeal...


     

    Dear Reader,

     

    As you are no doubt aware, Swarajya is a media product that is directly dependent on support from its readers in the form of subscriptions. We do not have the muscle and backing of a large media conglomerate nor are we playing for the large advertisement sweep-stake.

     

    Our business model is you and your subscription.  And in challenging times like these, we need your support now more than ever.

     

    We deliver over 10 - 15 high quality articles with expert insights and views. From 7AM in the morning to 10PM late night we operate to ensure you, the reader, get to see what is just right.

     

    Becoming a Patron or a subscriber for as little as Rs 1200/year is the best way you can support our efforts.

    Get Swarajya in your inbox.


    Magazine


    Swarajya Magazine Cover Image
    Merchandise

    Merchandise


      Politics

      Not Like The Old Times: BJP's Feeble Victory In Rajasthan (Part I)

      Not Like The Old Times: BJP's Feeble Victory In Rajasthan (Part I)

      Venu Gopal Narayanan
      6h

      "Not Winning Solely On Modi's Popularity": Prashant Kishor Lists Out Four Reasons For BJP Victories In Three States

      Nishtha Anushree
      9h

      AIADMK Leadership Dispute: Madras High Court Rejects Sasikala's Bid For AIADMK Interim General Secretary Status

      Bhuvan Krishna
      11h

      Economy

      India Anticipated To Be Fastest Growing In Next Three Years, Set to Become Third Largest Economy By 2030: S&P

      India Anticipated To Be Fastest Growing In Next Three Years, Set to Become Third Largest Economy By 2030: S&P

      Nishtha Anushree
      13h

      Sensex Surpasses 69,000 For First Time As Investor Confidence Surges Post BJP Sweep In Three States

      Bhuvan Krishna
      15h

      Sensex, Nifty Close At All-Time High After BJP Victories In Three States, Record Surge Of Over 2 Per Cent

      Nishtha Anushree
      1d

      Defence

      On This Day, In 1971, Indian Navy Struck Pakistan's Naval Fleet At Karachi, Sank PNS Ghazi At Visakhapatnam, And Decimated Tanks In Longewala

      On This Day, In 1971, Indian Navy Struck Pakistan's Naval Fleet At Karachi, Sank PNS Ghazi At Visakhapatnam, And Decimated Tanks In Longewala

      Ujjwal Shrotryia
      9h

      On This Day, In 1971, Indian Air Force Struck Pakistani Installations For The Second Straight Day, Setting Stage For Historic Naval Raids On Karachi

      Ujjwal Shrotryia
      1d

      IAF's Mighty 'Mi-26,' Able To Lift Chinooks, Set For Overhaul With Russian Help

      Ujjwal Shrotryia
      1d

      World

      Moody's Downgrades China's Credit Ranking From Stable To Negative Citing Continuous Contraction Of Property Sector

      Moody's Downgrades China's Credit Ranking From Stable To Negative Citing Continuous Contraction Of Property Sector

      Nishtha Anushree
      9h

      Not Enough Joining US Military: Here's An Interesting Solution By A Senator — Let Illegal Immigrants Join, In Exchange For Citizenship

      Swarajya Staff
      15h

      Chinese Economic Crisis Deepens As Debt Defaults Reach Record High

      Swarajya Staff
      1d

      Culture

      'Celebrate At Home': Champat Rai Of Ram Janambhoomi Trust Urges Hindus Not To Visit Ayodhya On 22 January

      'Celebrate At Home': Champat Rai Of Ram Janambhoomi Trust Urges Hindus Not To Visit Ayodhya On 22 January

      Bhuvan Krishna
      15h

      'Animal': Sandeep Reddy Vanga 2 – Liberals 0

      K Balakumar
      3d

      Why The Insidious Anti-Hindu Communalism Of Certain Directors Goes Scot-Free

      Anonymous Contributor
      4d
      States

      infrastructure


      Arun Kumar Das
      1

      Delhi-Meerut-Ghaziabad RRTS: Power Supply Commences Beyond Priority Section On Rapid Rail Corridor

      2 Mins Read
      Amit Mishra
      2

      Groove On The Go: Delhi Metro Unveils Pilot Project For Audio Ads And Jingles

      1 Mins Read
      Amit Mishra
      3

      Vadnagar: Airport In The Works For PM Modi's Hometown, Central Team To Study Feasibility

      2 Mins Read
      Amit Mishra
      4

      Delhi-Meerut RRTS Corridor Achieves 67 Per Cent Completion, On Course For 2025 Deadline

      2 Mins Read