Delhi High Court Seeks Centre’s Response On Plea To Make Rape Laws Gender-NeutralDelhi High Court (Pradeep Gaur/Mint via Getty Images)

The High Court of Delhi has sought the central government’s response to a plea seeking to declare the "gender-specific" sections related to rape and its punishment under Indian Penal Code (IPC) as unconstitutional.

A bench of Acting Chief Justice Gita Mittal and Justice C Hari Shankar asked the government to reply within three weeks and posted the matter for further hearing on 23 October.

Section 375 of the IPC deals with rape committed by man and section 376 lists out the punishment for the said offence.

"IPC 375 and IPC 376, in current form, which is gender specific and not gender neutral, doesn’t secure males and thus doesn’t stand the constitutional test and fails in Right to Privacy," the petition, filed by activist Sanjjiiv Kkumaar said. He also said that as per the recent apex court ruling on Right to Privacy, both male and female have equal protection of law under the Constitution.

The petition said that no one can claim special privilege if the perpetrator of the crime is a female and she is immune to criminal action.

"Similarly, if the (rape) victim is male, he has right of equal protection, equal to that of a female in like circumstances," it said and added that 63 countries have gender-neutral rape laws.

"After the Right to Privacy ruling where consent and bodily integrity of each citizen is now a fundamental right as part of the freedoms and are intrinsic part of right to life and personal liberty under Article 21, female and male both have equality before law and equal protection of law under Article 14 guaranteed by Part III of the Constitution," the petition said.

Kkumaar also pointed out that for a brief period of 58 days, India had a gender neutral rape law – The Criminal Law (Amendment) Ordinance 2013 which was repealed after protests from certain quarters of the society.

The plea, also referred to the recent murder of a boy in the Ryan International school in Gurgaon, allegedly by a 42 year-old man after he had resisted an attempt to sodomise him.

It said that boys under the age of 18 are protected under Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act (POCSO), but once they pass the age, they "are robbed of their rights". "It becomes very difficult to accept that there is a single reality in rape; that is, men rape women and ... this act has a meaning so different for men that it cannot be labelled as rape," it added.

The petition also claimed that the notion of patriarchy was the reason why men refused to come out in the open to report sexual crimes against them.

"If a male alleges that a female raped him, he is not seen as a Real Man because the stereotypical patriarchal assumption of men are superior and stronger to women comes into the picture," it said. PTI

Also Read: How Much Longer Will India’s Rape Laws Not Recognise That Men Could Be Victims Too?

An Appeal...

Dear Reader,

As you are no doubt aware, Swarajya is a media product that is directly dependent on support from its readers in the form of subscriptions. We do not have the muscle and backing of a large media conglomerate nor are we playing for the large advertisement sweep-stake.

Our business model is you and your subscription. And in challenging times like these, we need your support now more than ever.

We deliver over 10 - 15 high quality articles with expert insights and views. From 7AM in the morning to 10PM late night we operate to ensure you, the reader, get to see what is just right.

Becoming a Patron or a subscriber for as little as Rs 1200/year is the best way you can support our efforts.

Become A Patron
Become A Subscriber
Advertisement