The Supreme Court is set to deliver its verdict on the Ayodhya Ram Janmabhoomi appeal today.
The case with the Supreme Court, in brief, comprises of a set of appeals against the judgement of the Allahabad High Court, delivered in 2010, and the cross appeals that eventually followed.
The central issue of the suits with Allahabad HC was a dispute over the title of a parcel of land measuring an extent of about 2.77 acres in Ayodhya, Uttar Pradesh.
The Allahabad HC judgement of 2010 effectively gave two-thirds of the area in question to Hindus and one-third to Muslims. The area given to the Hindus included, amongst others, the Ram Janmabhoomi. In other words, the space under the domes of the erstwhile disputed structure.
To be sure, there were three parties in the case. The Hindu parties, the Nirmohi Akhara, and the Muslim parties. The High Court had divided the land among these three.
That bench was comprised of Justices Sudhir Agarwal, Dharam Veer Sharma and SU Khan.
In the previous four decades five separate suits had been filed on the same matter before the Faizabad civil court. These were then transferred to a full bench of the Allahabad High Court in 1989.
The dispute had been a long one with evidence of Hindu worship at the site being recorded as early as the 18th century and Hindus visiting the site area as a pilgrimage spot for centuries before.
In 1859, after local disturbances, the British colonial government put up fences in the site to separate the section where Hindus conducted worship from the rest of the land parcel.
This state of affairs lasted nine decades when in 1949 Sant Digvijay Nath of the Gorakhnath mutt organised a recitation of the Ramacharitamanas at the site.
After the end of the recitation, idols of Rama and Sita had been placed under the central dome of the disputed structure. This was carried out by Hindu activists who broke through the fences during night hours.
Between 1949 to 1986 the government refused access to the site for Hindus but allowed a priest to conduct puja once a year for the idols that had been installed in 1949.
In an attempt to appease Hindu voters after cowering to the Islamist sentiment in the Shah Bano case, the then prime minister Rajiv Gandhi arranged, through local judges, to remove the locks/fences that were keeping the Hindus away from the idols.
That phase of the Ram Mandir movement culminated with the razing of the disputed structure on 6 December 1992.
Back to 2010 now. Soon after the Allahabad HC gave its judgement, the Muslim parties appealed against it in the Supreme Court. The Supreme Court, on its part, announced a stay on the High Court judgement in 2011.
Soon the case became one of cross appeals and it is this case that will see its conclusion today.
An appeal from Swarajya
At Swarajya, we rely on our readers' support through subscriptions to sustain our media platform. Unlike larger conglomerates, we are unable to relentlessly chase advertising money — our model is largely built on your patronage.
Your support has never been more crucial. We work tirelessly to deliver 10-15 high-quality articles daily, ensuring you receive insightful content from 7 AM to 10 PM.
If you believe India's story has to be articulated in a way it has never been done before without shrugging it off, become a patron (or) subscribe now for ₹̶2̶4̶0̶0̶ ₹1999 and get 12 print issues, unlimited digital access for 1 year, a special India that is Bharat T-shirt (Offer ends soon).
We are counting on you!