Insta
file photo
In a big development, the Supreme Court bench has said that the Babri mosque wasn’t built on a vacant land, and agreed with the ASI findings that there was a Hindu-structure beneath the mosque.
However, the court also said that the ASI report didn’t state that the mosque was built after demolishing a temple. The court also said that the title of the land can be decided only on legal evidence.
Mere existence of a structure beneath the mosque cannot lead to a title today even if the SC finds that it was a Hindu temple, SC says. This hints at the fact that the court may discount the faith of the Hindus as far as the legal ownership of the Janmabhoomi is considered.
The court also wondered whether belief and faith is justified is beyond the ken of judicial scrutiny. It mentioned that the accounts of the travellers that mention the Ram Temple have to be taken with “circumspection”.
It also said that faith and belief of Ayodhya being birthplace of Ram is undisputed so is that of Muslims to worship at the mosque.
Support Swarajya's 50 Ground Reports Project & Sponsor A Story
Every general election Swarajya does a 50 ground reports project.
Aimed only at serious readers and those who appreciate the nuances of political undercurrents, the project provides a sense of India's electoral landscape. As you know, these reports are produced after considerable investment of travel, time and effort on the ground.
This time too we've kicked off the project in style and have covered over 30 constituencies already. If you're someone who appreciates such work and have enjoyed our coverage please consider sponsoring a ground report for just Rs 2999 to Rs 19,999 - it goes a long way in helping us produce more quality reportage.
You can also back this project by becoming a subscriber for as little as Rs 999 - so do click on this links and choose a plan that suits you and back us.
Click below to contribute.
Latest