Politics
Can terror and talks go together? India’s foreign secretary, S Jaishankar, gave a near categorical answer to the question and it was a “yes”.
Speaking on the second day of the Counter-Terrorism Conference organised by the India Foundation today (3 February) in the Pink City of Jaipur, India’s foreign secretary, S Jaishankar said talks were the only way to remain in touch and hope to get the other party to act on terror. He justified the forthcoming talks that he will be holding with his Pakistani counterpart and also the NSA-level talks initiated with that terror-sponsoring state.
Jaishankar’s response was to a question from the audience, but his main address was about how the international community was finally getting its act together on countering terrorism. The need for coordinated action against terrorism has come to the top of the global agenda in the context of the rise of Islamic State and its ability to reach right into the heart of Europe – as evidenced in the recent Paris attacks.
Jaishankar said that compared to the 1980s and early 1990s, when the world preferred to ignore terrorism that did not happen in the west, today there is clear consensus that terror is a global scourge. If it was once said that one man’s terrorist was another’s freedom fighter, today few people are willing to buy this argument.
The emerging global consensus is debunking old methods of living in denial. Today “Root” causes are no longer accepted as justification for terrorism. “Care-givers” of terrorism are seen as likely to be bitten by the terrorists they nurture – as Pakistan and others are finding out.
Buying peace at home with one group of terrorists does not give you immunity from it – as Europe is finding out. How you respond to terrorism outside your country cannot be different from how you respond to it internally – a lesson for India, which has been pussyfooting around terrorism in some states.
Non-state actors may provide an alibi for the state, but it is the state that provides oxygen to terror groups. The global response to terror is now focusing on crimping the finances of terror-linked groups, monitoring the sources of weapons and ammunition to terror outfits, etc.
Jaishankar emphasised that the world is waking up to the reality that the Westphalian state cannot avoid responsibility for what happens within its borders. He advocated the need to cause reputational damage to states sponsoring terror. By “naming and shaming” them, and by diplomatically isolating such states, it will raise the cost of their support to terrorism.
Of course, the terror outfits themselves cannot be affected by “naming and shaming” as publicity helps their cause and achieves their purpose better – which is to terrorise.
Support Swarajya's 50 Ground Reports Project & Sponsor A Story
Every general election Swarajya does a 50 ground reports project.
Aimed only at serious readers and those who appreciate the nuances of political undercurrents, the project provides a sense of India's electoral landscape. As you know, these reports are produced after considerable investment of travel, time and effort on the ground.
This time too we've kicked off the project in style and have covered over 30 constituencies already. If you're someone who appreciates such work and have enjoyed our coverage please consider sponsoring a ground report for just Rs 2999 to Rs 19,999 - it goes a long way in helping us produce more quality reportage.
You can also back this project by becoming a subscriber for as little as Rs 999 - so do click on this links and choose a plan that suits you and back us.
Click below to contribute.
Latest