This total storage capacity of 39.14 million barrels, which equals around 10 days of crude oil net imports, came online in phases, starting with the commissioning of the Visakhapatnam facility in June 2015, followed by the Mangalore facility in October 2016.

Both went online after seven years of construction.

Finally, the biggest facility of all, Padur, was commissioned in December 2018 with construction work having started in May 2010.

Factoring in the 65 days’ worth of storage that Indian refiners are required to maintain along with the Phase 1 SPR facilities, not only is India still 15 days short of the minimum requirement as per International Energy Agency (IEA) norms, it also explains why we cannot hoard up on crude oil on a whim, simply because the prices look tantalising.

A Comparison

To understand what India needs to do to improve its energy security, a look at the health of SPRs of other countries would be helpful.

Based on a recent comment by a National Energy Administration (NEA) official, China has around 80 days of oil in storage, including those in its SPR, oil storage at national oil firms and commercial stocks, all of which equates to about 790 million barrels.

Even so, there have been reports of China increasing purchases of cheap crude to fill up their SPR facilities.

Japan is estimated to have an in-country crude oil storage capacity of 320 million barrels and an overall total crude storage capacity, including privately held reserves, of 580 million barrels. This is equivalent to about a total storage capacity of above 150 days, way above the minimum prescribed by the IEA.

A Work In Progress

In June 2018, the Indian government gave its approval to set up additional SPR capacities of 19 million barrels in Padur and 28.5 million barrels in Chandikhol, Odisha.

Once operational this will be an additional 47.5 million barrels, which is equivalent to 12 days of crude oil import bringing the total reserve capacity for India to 87 days, putting it within close distance of the 90-day target recommended by the IEA.

Following the announcement of Phase 2 of India’s SPR, however, there has been little progress on the status of either facility.

It is understood that the government wants to carry this phase out with a public private partnership (PPP) approach.

Ideally, a decision on the contractors should have been made towards the end of 2019 but that does not seem to have happened. The current Covid-19 situation and delays in decision-making notwithstanding, it is vital that India completes the commissioning of Phase 2 in four to five years from the start of construction, at the earliest.

The Phase 1 reserves, from the conception of the idea of strategic reserves in 1998 to the full commissioning of the first SPR facility in 2015, took approximately 17 years.

In contrast, the first SPR in China took close to five years from concept to operation.

From the first facility in Zhenhai in 2004 to four facilities in Phase 1, China built a capacity of 102 million barrels by 2009.

Phase 2 with a planned storage of 280 million barrels started in 2011 across eight additional sites, the locations of which were never made official.

The Phase 2 facilities took less than four years to complete. There are now reports of a Phase 3 with a planned addition of 150 million barrels in Tianjin by the end of 2023.

Aiming For Quick Laps And Easy Wins

While China provides an overwhelming account of how rapidly a nation built up a SPR programme from scratch, there is very little insight to draw any helpful strategies from.

For that, it might be prudent to look towards Japan.

For starters, Japan’s SPR programme, commonly referred to as ‘oil stockpiling’ is transparent, and is open to collaboration with other nations. Japan has had a strategic petroleum reserves programme since the early 1940s.

In 1975, with the passing of the Oil Stockpiling Act, the country streamlined its SPR policy to give it the efficient edge it has today.

There are three components to Japan’s reserves: government oil stockpiling, private sector oil stockpiling and joint stock with oil producing countries.

The act sets a 90-day target for the government and 70 days for the private sector.

The joint oil stock is a recent arrangement with Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates (UAE), which commenced in 2009, where reserves are stored in tanks located in these countries.

There is currently 10 million barrels of Japan’s strategic crude oil reserves being stored in both Saudi Arabia and the UAE.

The Indian government could also take guidance from the Japanese approach by creating SPR legislation, which could ensure the expedition of SPR projects. The legislation could also push for the private sector to increase its storage from 65 days to, say, 75 days.

Like Japan, India needs to seriously consider setting up strategic reserves from between five to 10 days in important oil producing nations such as Saudi Arabia, the UAE, Russia and even the US.

It is well known that infrastructure projects in India are often impaired by slow decision-making, bureaucratic red-tape and various legal challenges brought about by public interest litigations (PIL).

However there comes a time when projects of national importance that address strategic vulnerabilities need to be championed until on-schedule operations.

The experience and learnings from Phase-1 will need to aid in the faster completion of subsequent phases.

Considering the volatility of the oil prices and the increasing geopolitical challenges in the Indian Ocean region, with a pandemic on the loose and the inevitable economic challenges added to the mix, it is of critical national importance that India completes the Phase 2 of SPRs with as little pilferage of time and resources as possible.

Naren Menon

Get Swarajya in your inbox.