In a setback to Delhi Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal, the Supreme Court on Tuesday (22 November) dismissed his petition seeking the quashing of criminal defamation proceedings against him initiated by Finance Minister Arun Jaitley.
Kejriwal in his plea contended that Jaitley has also filed a civil suit in the Delhi High Court.
Dismissing the plea, the bench of Justice Pinaki Chandra Ghose and Justice Uday Umesh Lalit asked senior counsel Ram Jethmalani to show a law under which criminal and civil proceedings cannot go together.
As it was contended that the outcome of civil proceedings before the High Court would have a bearing on the criminal defamation proceedings before the higher court, the bench asked if there is a provision in the Evidence Act that says the High Court judgement in a civil case will be binding on the criminal defamation case.
The criminal and civil defamation proceedings were initiated by Jaitley against Kejriwal following allegations of wrongdoing in the Delhi District Cricket Association (DDCA) when the finance minister was at the helm of the state cricketing body.
With inputs from IANS
An appeal from Swarajya
At Swarajya, we rely on our readers' support through subscriptions to sustain our media platform. Unlike larger conglomerates, we are unable to relentlessly chase advertising money — our model is largely built on your patronage.
Your support has never been more crucial. We work tirelessly to deliver 10-15 high-quality articles daily, ensuring you receive insightful content from 7 AM to 10 PM.
If you believe India's story has to be articulated in a way it has never been done before without shrugging it off, become a patron (or) subscribe now for ₹̶2̶4̶0̶0̶ ₹1999 and get 12 print issues, unlimited digital access for 1 year, a special India that is Bharat T-shirt (Offer ends soon).
We are counting on you!