NASA To Retain Former Administrator James Webb’s Name On Its Path-breaking Space Telescope
NASA investigated whether James Webb was involved in the firing of government employees for their sexual orientation during his leadership at the US State Department and NASA in the 1950s and 1960s.
No evidence has been found linking Webb to this wave of oppression in the US at the time, says a NASA report detailing the investigation.
The awe-generating infrared machine, set up early this year about 15 lakh kilometres out in space, goes about casually taking arguably the most stunning images ever.
Though we call it the James Webb Space Telescope, the use of the name “James Webb” has been a cause for controversy for quite a while.
James Edwin Webb was the second administrator of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA), a fledgling agency at the time.
He led the space agency from 1961 to 1968 — a time when the great American dream of landing a man on the Moon before the end of the decade went from an idea to near-reality.
Webb left NASA just as Project Apollo was nearing a successful completion.
While his leadership of NASA during such an extraordinary chapter of US space history was a terrific achievement, allegations have been made repeatedly that Webb's term was less than clean.
It has been claimed that government employees were fired from their jobs for their sexual orientation during Webb's leadership at the US State Department (Under Secretary of State, 1949 to 1952) and at NASA (1961 to 1968).
This period coincides with the troubling time of the “Lavender Scare” in the US, when thousands of gay employees were from the federal workforce because of their sexuality.
Such was the time that homosexuality was by the American Psychological Association in 1952.
Concerns have been expressed, therefore, about whether Webb himself promoted anti-LGBTQI+ policies. Naturally, to change the name of NASA’s most powerful space telescope have been made for years.
So, in March 2021, NASA — specifically the agency’s chief historian Brian C Odom — launched a historical investigation of the matter.
Odom looked closely at Webb’s time in leadership at the US State Department and at the space agency. Under review were more than 50,000 documents from archival collections at various NASA centres and dedicated federal records agencies, such as the Truman Presidential Library and the National Archives and Records Administration.
The findings of this extensive investigation have been , released on 18 November.
The takeaway? “The report found no evidence that Webb was either a leader or proponent of firing government employees for their sexual orientation,” a NASA statement said.
The report says: “... to date, no available evidence directly links Webb to any actions or follow-up related to the firing of individuals for their sexual orientation. However, the research and this report make clear that the Lavender Scare was a painful chapter in our national history.”
What this means is that the James Webb Space Telescope will retain its name. It will survive a second renaming.
Before bearing the name of the former NASA administrator, the successor to the Hubble Space Telescope was plainly called the “Next Generation Space Telescope,” until its renaming in September 2002.
Though space telescopes are traditionally named after scientists, such as in the case of Hubble, this powerful telescope was named after an administrator, by an administrator.
The James Webb Space Telescope is a $10 billion large infrared telescope with an approximately 6.5-metre primary mirror.
, Webb “will study every phase in the history of our Universe, ranging from the first luminous glows after the Big Bang, to the formation of solar systems capable of supporting life on planets like Earth, to the evolution of our own Solar System.”
It has been uncovering the universe in magnificent detail, little by little, during the roughly four months that it has been doing science from around the Second Lagrange Point, its home in space.
As you are no doubt aware, Swarajya is a media product that is directly dependent on support from its readers in the form of subscriptions. We do not have the muscle and backing of a large media conglomerate nor are we playing for the large advertisement sweep-stake.
Our business model is you and your subscription. And in challenging times like these, we need your support now more than ever.
We deliver over 10 - 15 high quality articles with expert insights and views. From 7AM in the morning to 10PM late night we operate to ensure you, the reader, get to see what is just right.
Becoming a Patron or a subscriber for as little as Rs 1200/year is the best way you can support our efforts.