Tamil Nadu
Supreme Court Issues Notice To Udhayanidhi Stalin For 'Eradicate Sanatana Dharma' Remarks
S Rajesh
Sep 22, 2023, 01:38 PM | Updated 01:38 PM IST
Save & read from anywhere!
Bookmark stories for easy access on any device or the Swarajya app.
A Supreme Court bench of Justices Aniruddha Bose and Bela M Trivedi today (22 September) issued notices to Udhayanidhi Stalin, the Tamil Nadu government and others regarding his remarks calling for the eradication of Sanatana Dharma by comparing with diseases like dengue, malaria and corona.
Udhayanidhi had said, "I congratulate the organisers for calling the conference as 'eradicate Sanatana Dharma' instead of 'opposing Sanatana Dharma.'
"There are some things which we have to eradicate and we can't merely oppose. Mosquitoes, dengue fever, malaria, corona, all these are things which we cannot oppose, we have to eradicate them. Sanatanam is also like this.
"Eradicating and not opposing Sanatanam should be our first task.
"What is Sanatanam? The name Sanatanam has come from Sanskrit. Sanatanam is against equality and social justice. The meaning of Sanatanam is nothing but 'permanence', something which cannot be changed. Nobody can question. This is the meaning of Sanatanam."
According to a report by Deccan Herald, the notices were issued on a plea by an advocate B Jagannath, who sought a CBI investigation into the case and an FIR to be lodged against Udhayanidhi.
Among the measures sought by Jagannath were an injunction against Udhayanidhi, A Raja and others against making any further comments on Sanatana Dharma or Hinduism, a declaration that Udhayanidhi's participation in the conference to eradicate Sanatana Dharma was unconstitutional, a report from the police as to why was permission given for such a conference and the appointment of a nodal officer for hate speech.
The Supreme Court's action comes around two weeks after a group of 262 eminent citizens wrote a letter to Chief Justice of India asking him to take suo moto cognisance of the remarks.
They had written that Udhayanidhi's remarks constituted 'hate speech' and the state government should have taken action against him without waiting for a formal complaint as per earlier directions of the Supreme Court.
Multiple FIRs had been filed against Udhayanidhi across the country.
Save & read from anywhere!
Bookmark stories for easy access on any device or the Swarajya app.
S Rajesh is Staff Writer at Swarajya.
Support Swarajya's 50 Ground Reports Project & Sponsor A Story
Every general election Swarajya does a 50 ground reports project.
Aimed only at serious readers and those who appreciate the nuances of political undercurrents, the project provides a sense of India's electoral landscape. As you know, these reports are produced after considerable investment of travel, time and effort on the ground.
This time too we've kicked off the project in style and have covered over 30 constituencies already. If you're someone who appreciates such work and have enjoyed our coverage please consider sponsoring a ground report for just Rs 2999 to Rs 19,999 - it goes a long way in helping us produce more quality reportage.
You can also back this project by becoming a subscriber for as little as Rs 999 - so do click on this links and choose a plan that suits you and back us.
Click below to contribute.