Of Unaddressed Elephants And Pakistan
A reset in the US-Pakistan relations that overlooks the dysfunctionality of the Pakistani state is doomed to be a non-starter.
Fraying around the edges , the ties between the two Cold War allies hit the nadir in 2018, when President Trump called out Pakistani on Twitter and suspended security assistance worth millions of dollars.
The assistance remains suspended despite the Pakistani role in delivering the Taliban to the negotiating table. And while calls for a reset are quite common with new leaders at the helm, there is much more to the timing than the change of guard in the US.
Since 2018, Pakistan has lost two of its primary sources of aid — the US and With no relief in sight at the FATF either, it is trapped in a vicious circle of debt servicing. As the Afghan War draws to a close and the new US administration busies itself in the Indo-Pacific theatre, Pakistan is rapidly running out of leverage.
Staring squarely at yet another relapse into the spells of that have punctuated the US-Pakistan relations, it is looking to escape the sanctions and economic abandonment that are characteristic of these periods.
Although the limited goal of keeping Pakistan relevant in the American scheme of things is quite reasonable, it fails to address the countless proverbial elephants in the room and sweeps the mother of all those elephants — the dysfunctionality of the Pakistani state itself — under the carpet (a task, as Bernard Woolley of ‘Yes Minister’ would remind us, literally impossible).
And while a lot has been written about as well, it does not seem to find much traction in the clamour for a reset. The recommendations that begin with the economic security paradigm eventually veer off into the hoary trope of ‘parity with India’ and its concomitants — ‘strategic depth in Afghanistan’ and ‘mediation with China’.
A reset in the US-Pakistan relations that overlooks the dysfunctionality of the Pakistani state, characterised by the obsessive focus on India, which has hijacked its domestic and international discourse and culminated in the capture of its state institutions by the Pakistani Army, is doomed to be a non-starter.
Appearing on various web-based events, Dr. Moeed Yusuf, Prime Minister Imran Khan’s advisor on National Security, said that the new vision of Pakistan is to prioritise connectivity and and to eschew the policy of leveraging its geostrategic position for international aid.
With this new paradigm of economic security as the basis for revival, are a spate of measures, such as American investment in the Pakistani private sector, human development, as well as setting up of manufacturing facilities by American companies in Pakistan to enable access to Chinese markets, with a special focus on sectors like information technology, climate, energy, health and agriculture.
Ordinarily, foreign investment in the private sector of any country would not qualify as assistance. However, Pakistan is not just ‘any’ country. A large section of its private sector is hogged by a complex network of .
The odds that the US investment in the Pakistani “private sector” will not land in one of these enterprises are minuscule. What’s more, the security environment in the country is so precarious, with sectarian and other extremist groups running amok, that no foreign investment can be truly secure without the protection of the deep state that controls these elements.
With these feeble attempts to establish economic cooperation as a basis for the reset, the discussions return to the pet projects of Pakistan — ‘’, ‘strategic depth in Afghanistan and ‘mediation with China’.
The reports recommend adoption of a “regional approach” to human rights and democracy challenges in South Asia and a “clear and unambiguous position” on India’s , followed by a warning against Indian influence in Afghanistan.
On China, the US is advised to through the Development Finance Corporation (DFC) and the Blue Dot Network, to seek Pakistani assistance for and to even expand the concept of the Indo-Pacific to include Pakistan in it.
The expectations that Pakistan can get a genuine reset with the US without a change in its policy on India and Afghanistan are worrisome. At the same time, the recommendations on China and the Indo-Pacific are symptomatic of the gap in Pakistan’s assessment of the global outrage at China’s aggressive and opportunistic behaviour, as the world was busy dealing with the effects of Covid-19 pandemic.
And while none of this is unexpected, any impending reset with Pakistan must proceed with an eye on history. For more than 70 years, American economic assistance has been misappropriated by the Pakistani Army to consolidate its position and to weaken democratic institutions.
The hatred for India, the US and Israel is so ingrained in the popular discourse that any attempt toward a non-zero-sum political solution on Kashmir or, for that matter, even the has become tantamount to political suicide.
Pakistan’s record on cracking down on the UN-designated terrorist groups, as well as their financial activities, is no less dismal. The recent acquittal of Omar Saeed Sheikh, a collaborator in the Daniel Pearl murder, is a case in point.
The state department needs to re-evaluate its Pakistan outlook based on these facts.
It is also time that the discourse moved beyond the solution-to-Afghanistan-lies-in-Kashmir theory. Twenty years of occupation and billions of dollars of American taxpayers’ money expended have not prevented Pakistan from providing in its pursuit of strategic depth in Afghanistan.
With the deadline for the complete withdrawal of American and NATO troops approaching amidst rising violence and in Afghanistan, the Biden administration has indicated that it is not satisfied with Taliban’s record on .
As the US works toward a final troop withdrawal and countering the malignant Chinese influence at the global level, it must steer clear of the chimerical hopes of weaning Pakistan away from China and Afghanistan based on Kashmir.
A US-Pakistan reset that is not informed by these factors is destined to be a cosmetic exercise.
The views expressed in the article are personal views of the writer and do not represent the views of the government of India.
As you are no doubt aware, Swarajya is a media product that is directly dependent on support from its readers in the form of subscriptions. We do not have the muscle and backing of a large media conglomerate nor are we playing for the large advertisement sweep-stake.
Our business model is you and your subscription. And in challenging times like these, we need your support now more than ever.
We deliver over 10 - 15 high quality articles with expert insights and views. From 7AM in the morning to 10PM late night we operate to ensure you, the reader, get to see what is just right.
Becoming a Patron or a subscriber for as little as Rs 1200/year is the best way you can support our efforts.