Legal
Supreme Court of India (Sonu Mehta/Hindustan Times via Getty Images)
The Supreme Court on Friday (15 September) observed that that the FIR filed against members of the Editors’ Guild of India (EGI) was a “counter-narrative” of the Manipur government to the fact-finding report on the ethnic clashes in the state.
A bench led by Chief Justice of India D Y Chandrachud also noted that even if the statements in the EGI’s report were assumed to be false, they did not amount to an offence under Section 153A of the Indian Penal Code (IPC), which was the basis for the FIR registered earlier this month, reports The Print.
Section 153A of the IPC criminalises actions that promote hatred and enmity between different groups.
The apex court was hearing of a petition filed by the members of EGI, who sought the quashing of the case against them and protection from any coercive action by the Manipur Police.
Extending the interim protection given to the EGI office-bearers named in the FIR, the top court granted two-weeks to the Manipur government to submit its response to the petition.
The Solicitor General, Tushar Mehta, objected to the Supreme Court considering the petition. He suggested that the petitioners should seek relief from the Manipur High Court.
Appearing for the complainant who had lodged the FIR against EGI members, senior advocate Guru Krishnakumar stated that his client would withdraw the complaint if the EGI retracted its report, which was published on 2 September.
Furthermore, he accused the EGI's report of aggravating the situation in Manipur and claimed that a curfew had been reinstated after its publication.
EGI President Seema Mustafa and senior journalists Seema Guha, Bharat Bhushan, and Sanjay Kapoor, who are members of the EGI, have been named in the FIR. Guha, Bhushan and Kapoor had recently visited Manipur to conduct a study on media reporting regarding the ethnic clashes between the Kukis and the Meiteis. Their visit took place from 7 to 10 August.
According to the team's report, they found that the "leadership of the state" had become "partisan during the conflict".
Following their visit, N Sarat Singh, a social worker based in Imphal, filed an FIR against the four EGI members.
Singh accused them of attempting to "provoke clashes" in Manipur. A second FIR was also filed against the four, which included an additional charge of defamation.
Support Swarajya's 50 Ground Reports Project & Sponsor A Story
Every general election Swarajya does a 50 ground reports project.
Aimed only at serious readers and those who appreciate the nuances of political undercurrents, the project provides a sense of India's electoral landscape. As you know, these reports are produced after considerable investment of travel, time and effort on the ground.
This time too we've kicked off the project in style and have covered over 30 constituencies already. If you're someone who appreciates such work and have enjoyed our coverage please consider sponsoring a ground report for just Rs 2999 to Rs 19,999 - it goes a long way in helping us produce more quality reportage.
You can also back this project by becoming a subscriber for as little as Rs 999 - so do click on this links and choose a plan that suits you and back us.
Click below to contribute.
Latest