Swarajya Logo
Swarajya Logo
Politics States Economy Society Business Culture Infra Defence World Books Ideas Science Technology Heritage Archives Legal Movies Sports
  • Our Views
    Politics States Economy Society Business Culture Infra Defence World Books Ideas Science Technology Heritage Archives Legal Movies Sports
  • Magazine
  • Store

About Swarajya

Swarajya is a publication by Kovai Media Private Limited.

Swarajya - a big tent for liberal right of centre discourse that reaches out, engages and caters to the new India.

editor@swarajyamag.com

Useful Links

  • About Us
  • Subscriptions Support
  • Editorial Philosophy
  • Press Kit
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Code of Conduct
  • Plagiarism Policy
  • Refund & Cancellation Policy

Useful Links

  • About Us
  • Subscriptions Support
  • Editorial Philosophy
  • Press Kit
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Code of Conduct
  • Plagiarism Policy
  • Refund & Cancellation Policy

Participate

  • Contact Us
  • Write for us
  • Style Guide
  • Jobs

Stay Connected

  • Artboard 2 Copy 6Created with Sketch.
    Artboard 2 Copy 10Created with Sketch.
    Artboard 2 Copy 7Created with Sketch.
    Artboard 2 Copy 9Created with Sketch.
  • Andriod Logo
  • IOS Logo

Economy

GDP Series Is Flawed, But Not Fake: It Is The Politically-Loaded Criticism Of Data That Is Problematic

R JagannathanThursday, May 9, 2019 5:05 pm IST
All GDP calculations are good (or bad) guesses at the end of the day.
All GDP calculations are good (or bad) guesses at the end of the day.
All GDP calculations are good (or bad) guesses at the end of the day.
  • When political posturing masquerades as economic logic, it becomes a problem.
  • Here are four ways to take data out of the sphere of politics.
  • The old aphorism, that motherhood is fact, but fatherhood is a matter of opinion, probably applies to GDP data as well. Add politics to the mix, and fatherhood can also be a source of unfair point-scoring.

    The current GDP/GVA (gross domestic product/gross value added) series has been controversial for two reasons: for the first time ever, it shifted to measuring GVA using a new corporate database (MCA-21) that includes many benami or shell companies. But, equally importantly, it has been made controversial primarily because there is a huge anti-BJP political consensus around the narrative. The same statistical disputation under a Congress regime would not have drawn the kind of wholesale rubbishing of the data series that a BJP government, led especially by Narendra Modi, has drawn.

    At the outset let us be clear on one point: as in the case of fatherhood, any GDP methodology is only as good as its underlying premises and assumptions. It is derived from several numbers that in themselves are based on conjectures and assumptions. If, for example, you use the old Annual Survey of Industries data on companies, you have to make extrapolations for value-added by informal sector companies on which you don’t have enough data. This is not much better than guesswork. Similarly, you can calculate GDP using one set of assumed inflation numbers or another; depending on how you choose your GDP deflator, with a mix of consumer and wholesale prices, or only one of the two, your GDP will be enhanced or underestimated.

    So, even if the National Sample Survey Office (NSSO) now believes that nearly 36 per cent of the companies in the MCA-21 database are not traceable or wrongly classified, you can still estimate GDP based on some formula – just as you do for assessing the value-added of small and informal sector units. And trying to eliminate all shell company data from GDP numbers may also have problems, as former Chief Statistician Pronab Sen told Business Standard in an interview. “If you don’t include these firms in GDP calculations, we would not be capturing all transactions in the economy.”

    So, to make a simple point, all GDP calculations are good (or bad) guesses at the end of the day.

    The real problem is in adding a layer of political critique to what can at best be described as genuine disagreements among economists and statisticians on how GDP should be estimated.

    Sample, for example, former chief economic adviser Kaushik Basu’s statement, quoted in the Mint today (9 May): “India had a global reputation for the quality of its statistics. It is unfortunate to see this damaged. On the plus side, this can explain why India’s GDP numbers were not matching with its poor record of job creation.”

    This is political posturing masquerading as economic logic.

    Just because we are questioning the accuracy of statistical data today it does not automatically mean the old data was beyond reproach. It may just mean that economists were not so aggressively partisan then. And, in any event, the new GDP/GVA series with 2011-12 as base was being formulated when the UPA was in power; that it was released only after the NDA came to power is an accident of history.

    Basu is also being economical with the truth in pretending that growth and jobs are strongly correlated. He is free to conclude that jobs growth under Modi has been weak (we still don’t know that for sure), but it may not be primarily because GDP is lower than the official figures indicate. Basu should ask himself a basic question: can he produce one bit of evidence that in the higher growth years of UPA-1, jobs growth was any higher than it is today? Why is it that the official NSSO data for 2004 shows much higher job creation during a slower-growth period than in 2009?

    Basu should know that even in the USA, the link between GDP growth and jobs is broken, as economists Erik Brynjolfsson and Andrew McAfee of the MIT Sloan School have demonstrated. In an interview to Harvard Business Review, Brynjolfsson said: “Job gains were anemic throughout the 2000s, even when the (US) economy was expanding. This phenomenon is what we call the Great Decoupling. The two halves of the cycle of prosperity are no longer married: Economic abundance, as exemplified by GDP and productivity, has remained on an upward trajectory, but the income and job prospects for typical workers have faltered.”

    We need to seriously examine why jobs and growth are not so strongly correlated in India, instead of believing that bad data itself is the problem. Even if we assume that GDP, correctly calculated, is 1 per cent lower than it should be, we are talking an average of 6 per cent GDP growth over the last five years. Even 6 per cent growth – which is similar to what the NDA under Atal Bihari Vajpayee achieved – should have delivered more jobs than what we now believe it has done. Basu’s criticism is thus pure hogwash, a product of his political orientation.

    As for former finance minister P Chidambaram’s criticism, the less said the better. He said: “It turns out that the government has been using bogus data. The CSO growth figures are a sham.”

    In 2015, when the new GDP data series was introduced, Chidambaram actually welcomed it, since it showed that growth was 6.9 per cent in 2013-14, the last UPA year. On 30 January 2015, Chidambaram said: “The data released today and the other economic indicators conclusively establish that the UPA government succeeded in substantial measure on all the four objectives (of fiscal consolidation, containing the current account deficit, moderating inflation and “putting the economy back on the growth path.”) He added, for good measure: “I am happy that the (NDA) government has released the revised GDP data. It should put an end, once and for all time, to the misconceived charge that the UPA government had mismanaged the economy.”

    The problem clearly is that statistical data on the economy and jobs have been kicked around for political reasons. And the Modi government is surely not blameless in this regard. It should quickly release the last NSSO survey which put unemployment at a 45-year high of 6.1 per cent and challenge its basis openly by pointing out that in 2011-12, unemployment according to the Census was even higher – at over 11 per cent. At the very least, it will prove that the government is not hiding inconvenient data.

    The four actions points to take data out of the sphere of politics are the following:

    1) We should re-empower the National Statistical Commission and protect its independence from the executive, if needed by another enabling legislation.

    2) The government should create a formal cadre of statisticians and economists to manage all surveys and economic data estimations through a transparent process.

    3) We need a new, enlarged jobs data survey using much larger sample sizes (say, 300,0000 households). This high-frequency survey will tell us the real trend in jobs, both in the formal sector and the informal one. It will validate (or partly invalidate) the enterprise data we now get from the Employees Provident Fund Organisation. This data must come monthly, though we can start with quarterly surveys. Over time we will have a useful time series, and knowledge about the seasonal element in jobs.

    4) We also need annual and enterprise surveys, especially on small and micro enterprises, so that over time even the GDP series does not have to depend overly on dodgy MCA-21 data.

    If we get these things done, we can take the politics out of data substantially.

    Tags
    Narendra Modi
    GVA
    BJP
    Congress
    P Chidambaram
    NDA
    UPA
    politics
    GDP Growth
    Kaushik Basu
    National Sample Survey Office
    Erik Brynjolfsson
    Andrew McAfee

    Comments ↓

    An Appeal...


     

    Dear Reader,

     

    As you are no doubt aware, Swarajya is a media product that is directly dependent on support from its readers in the form of subscriptions. We do not have the muscle and backing of a large media conglomerate nor are we playing for the large advertisement sweep-stake.

     

    Our business model is you and your subscription.  And in challenging times like these, we need your support now more than ever.

     

    We deliver over 10 - 15 high quality articles with expert insights and views. From 7AM in the morning to 10PM late night we operate to ensure you, the reader, get to see what is just right.

     

    Becoming a Patron or a subscriber for as little as Rs 1200/year is the best way you can support our efforts.

    Get Swarajya in your inbox.


    Magazine


    Swarajya Magazine Cover Image
    Merchandise

    Merchandise


      Politics

      Four Reasons Why BJP Swept The State Of Madhya Pradesh

      Four Reasons Why BJP Swept The State Of Madhya Pradesh

      Tushar Gupta
      4h

      BJP Hits The High Notes; Congress Has To Be Happy With Consolation Prize

      R Jagannathan
      4h

      Mathur, Mandaviya, Nitin Nabin: Men Behind BJP's Spectacular Comeback In Chhattisgarh

      Swarajya Staff
      4h

      Economy

      Textile Industry In Tamil Nadu Affected By Increased Competitiveness Of Other States; High Cost Of Power And Labour Among Reasons: Report

      Textile Industry In Tamil Nadu Affected By Increased Competitiveness Of Other States; High Cost Of Power And Labour Among Reasons: Report

      Swarajya Staff
      1d

      Sorry, Cassandras. India's GDP Could Well Top 7 Per Cent In Fiscal 2023-24

      R Jagannathan
      3d

      India's GDP Grows 7.6 Per Cent In July-September Quarter

      Nayan Dwivedi
      3d

      Defence

      India To Secure Entire Pakistan And Bangladesh Borders In Next Two Years: Home Minister Amit Shah On BSF Day

      India To Secure Entire Pakistan And Bangladesh Borders In Next Two Years: Home Minister Amit Shah On BSF Day

      Nayan Dwivedi
      2d

      Indian Navy Makes History By Appointing First Female 'Commanding Officer' Of A Naval Ship

      Swarajya Staff
      2d

      Centre Putting All-Out Efforts To Bring Them Back: Indian Navy Chief On Veterans Sentenced To Death In Qatar

      Swarajya Staff
      2d

      World

      Hamas Leader, Who Virtually Addressed A Pro-Palestine Rally In Kerala In October, On Israeli Spy Agency's 'Kill List': Report

      Hamas Leader, Who Virtually Addressed A Pro-Palestine Rally In Kerala In October, On Israeli Spy Agency's 'Kill List': Report

      Swarajya Staff
      1d

      New Zealand: Three Khalistani Extremists Sentenced For Attempted Murder Of Radio Host Harnek Singh

      Swarajya Staff
      2d

      Brazilian City Council Unknowingly Enacts First AI-Written Ordinance

      Swarajya Staff
      2d

      Culture

      'Animal': Sandeep Reddy Vanga 2 – Liberals 0

      'Animal': Sandeep Reddy Vanga 2 – Liberals 0

      K Balakumar
      1d

      Why The Insidious Anti-Hindu Communalism Of Certain Directors Goes Scot-Free

      Anonymous Contributor
      2d

      Napoleon Film Review: Ridley Scott’s Waterloo

      Venu Gopal Narayanan
      2d
      States

      infrastructure


      Ankit Saxena
      1

      BJP’s Big Infrastructure Push In Madhya Pradesh Assured Their Victory

      6 Mins Read
      Arun Kumar Das
      2

      'Our Motto Is To Mobilise India By Making In India, For India And For The World': Siemens Mobility Head

      3 Mins Read
      Arun Kumar Das
      3

      Government Propels National Green Hydrogen Mission With Kochi Workshop

      2 Mins Read
      Arun Kumar Das
      4

      Railways Achieves 1015.6 Million Tonnes Freight Loading Between April-November 2023

      1 Mins Read