Even if Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Make in India succeeds, it will not bring with it a huge expansion in employment.
Organised manufacturing offers no nirvana, from the way it is playing out all over the world.
With hindsight, and only with hindsight, it can be said that India may have missed the bus altogether on manufacturing and export-led growth. China was probably the last major economy to gain from making itself a manufacturing and export powerhouse, but now the world is simply incapable of digesting another export-led economy like China, even assuming this can be done. India, even if it were capable of China-like policy moves, cannot probably make it.
This is because manufacturing’s golden age is gone. It is going through
the same process of huge increases in productivity that agriculture witnessed
in the 20th century. When productivity increases faster than demand
for long periods of time, an industry has
to shrink in terms of job growth.
Porter, writing in The New York Times points
out that it needed 45,000 workers to pluck 2.2 million tons of tomatoes in California
some 50 years ago. Then a new oblong tomato was developed after much research,
which could be picked faster with the help of harvesting machines. The unions
protested to stop job-destroying research, but even after the state stopped
funding research in this area, jobs still fell to around 5,000.
That’s what productivity did to jobs in agriculture. Today, farming accounts for less than 2 percent of total US employment.
Employment can shrink also due to other factors. In India, the artificial jacking up for rural wages through the introduction of MNREGA increased the pace of farm mechanisation, making more farm jobs redundant. MNREGA is a self-fulfilling prophecy.
global manufacturing is headed for shrinkage. According to Bruce Greenwald, the
Robert Heilbrunn Professor of Finance and Asset Management at the Columbia
Business School, manufacturing’s glory days are over, and its demise will lead
to a slowdown, if not a shrinking, of economies that depend on manufacturing
exports – with China, currently factory to the world, being the biggest
potential loser (Read Greenwald’s ideas as summarised by Robert Huebscher here).
In other words, manufacturing in a productivity-enhancing scenario, will
become a zero-sum game, where any gain by one country is going to be at the
expense of another, whether this gain happens through higher productivity or
currency manipulation or by building a moat around your economy, as both
Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump are promising in order to protect American
It also (partially) explains why India has seen a sustained fall in
exports for nearly 16 months consecutively. The global slowdown is, no doubt, a
causative factor, but clearly exports can grow only if the currency depreciates
faster than those of our major competitors, or we up productivity by a huge
margin. Neither of this can happen without serious reforms. This means land and
labour laws must be changed to make factory productivity grow faster than before,
and faster than the rest of the world, but this ain’t happening at all.
Greenwald has been quoted as saying: “Manufacturing is done, and it is
not anybody’s fault. The global productivity growth in manufacturing properly
measured is 5 percent to 7 percent a year, and manufacturing demand is maybe 3
percent annually,” he said. For India, this means if we do not up productivity
growth even faster than 5-7 percent annually, our manufacturing growth will
shrink, as technology and demand kill off new investments.
But what is a growing trend in manufacturing, is slowly showing up in
can see that happening in sector after sector in India too. In manufacturing, automotive
companies – big generators of jobs in the past - now use more and more robots
even in India. Maruti uses 1,000 robots, Hyundai 400, Ford 437 and Tata Motors
100, according to this Economic Times
report from last year. This year the numbers must be higher.
Banks use ATMs and internet technology more than branches, and more jobs must have gone out of the window. Washing machines, vacuum cleaners and dish-washers will ultimately reduce demand for domestic labour. If Google’s driverless cars finally succeed in getting regulatory clearances, even chauffeurs will be redundant. Automation is destroying jobs in services as much as manufacturing.
In the one industry where India has been a world-beater – software services, which employ 3.5 million people – automation is slowing down job growth. Vishal Sikka, CEO of Infosys, has said that he plans to reduce bench strength and invest more in automation.
need not accept the Luddite position that all automation will destroy jobs;
productivity growth also creates jobs, but they destroy lower-skill jobs and
increase them at the higher end, making it impossible for the modern economy to
shift skillsets from one area to another as fast. In effect, jobs are being destroyed.
This is particularly problematic for a country like India, which is seeing manufacturing jobs disappear at such low levels of per capita income. The job of removing poverty by creating productive jobs has gotten tougher.
Dani Rodrik, a Turkish economist, has an interesting chart showing the years in which manufacturing employment peaked in various countries, and their per capita income at that time. His figures show manufacturing employment peaking in Denmark at $18,034 of per capita income, in Japan at $16,138, in the US at $14,765, in Mexico at $ 6,634, and in Brazil at $4,447. India is the saddest case of them all where manufacturing employment may have peaked at a per capita income of $602 (see the chart in this story).
This means even if Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Make in India succeeds, it will not bring with it a huge expansion in employment – except maybe in services downstream.
People have to figure out their own jobs. Maybe Stand Up India and Mudra Bank will help people self-create jobs. Organised manufacturing offers no nirvana, from the way it is playing out all over the world.
It also explains why people think job reservations in government are the only answer. The private sector is simply not doing it anymore.