Swarajya Logo
Swarajya Logo
Politics States Economy Society Business Culture Infra Defence World Books Ideas Science Technology Heritage Archives Legal Movies Sports
  • Our Views
    Politics States Economy Society Business Culture Infra Defence World Books Ideas Science Technology Heritage Archives Legal Movies Sports
  • Magazine
  • Store

About Swarajya

Swarajya is a publication by Kovai Media Private Limited.

Swarajya - a big tent for liberal right of centre discourse that reaches out, engages and caters to the new India.

editor@swarajyamag.com

Useful Links

  • About Us
  • Subscriptions Support
  • Editorial Philosophy
  • Press Kit
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Code of Conduct
  • Plagiarism Policy
  • Refund & Cancellation Policy

Useful Links

  • About Us
  • Subscriptions Support
  • Editorial Philosophy
  • Press Kit
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Code of Conduct
  • Plagiarism Policy
  • Refund & Cancellation Policy

Participate

  • Contact Us
  • Write for us
  • Style Guide
  • Jobs

Stay Connected

  • Artboard 2 Copy 6Created with Sketch.
    Artboard 2 Copy 10Created with Sketch.
    Artboard 2 Copy 7Created with Sketch.
    Artboard 2 Copy 9Created with Sketch.
  • Andriod Logo
  • IOS Logo

Economy

Success Of Make In India Difficult Without Simple Dispute Resolution Mechanism

Abhishek DwivediWednesday, February 24, 2016 4:30 pm IST
Article Hero Image
Article Hero Image

The scheme of Make-in-India requires India to have a predictable and easy commercial dispute resolution mechanism to attract foreign investments and thus, it is time, the government amended the arbitration law.

On 15th August 2014, when Mr. Modi, as Prime Minister, announced the scheme of Make-in-India from Red fort, inviting foreign investors to invest and manufacture in India, it generated a lot of positivity in the markets. Subsequently, the Companies Act, 2013 was amended among a host of other amendments. FDI limit in insurance and defense sectors was increased. While most of changes and amendments were brought in the substantive and regulatory laws, the dispute resolution aspect of the commercial transactions remained unaddressed.

In December 2014, an ordinance to amend the obsolete Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 was approved by cabinet prompting a positive response in the markets. However, it was never sent to President for his assent. Again, in February 2015, the Law Ministry hinted on bringing a bill in the Budget Session to amend the act. The rumors appeared once again before the Monsoon session that the Bill may be introduced in Parliament. The rumors, in both cases, turned out to be just that, rumors.

PM Modi displaying a Make In India brochure (AFP PHOTO/RAVEENDRAN)
PM Modi displaying a Make In India brochure (AFP PHOTO/RAVEENDRAN)
PM Modi displaying a Make In India brochure (AFP PHOTO/RAVEENDRAN)

The government so far has failed to even introduce the amendment act. The latest news on the issue is that the bill has been approved by Cabinet and will be presented in the winter session. This is an issue of concern to foreign investors who are waiting to see if the actions of this government match its tall promises.

While the arbitration law in India requires amendments for domestic as well as foreign arbitrations, the present article limits itself to amendments required to sort the issues concerning foreign arbitrations. This is specifically in order to emphasize the need to attract and protect foreign investments in the country.

What is the need for an amendment?

The requirement of amendment to the present Act arises on four counts.

1. It is just

It is nothing less than injustice when commercial disputes remain pending for years in want of effective means of resolution. Despite the notion of arbitration based on the principle of least judicial intervention, the courts have failed to exercise restrain while dealing with matters of arbitration. The entire process of arbitration becomes redundant as the Act gives Courts wide ranging powers and discretion to review it. This judicial intrusion renders the decisions of the arbitration tribunal (called awards) practically unenforceable in many cases.

2. Provides stable business environment

There is no doubt that investors require a stable business environment along with a predictable and efficient system of resolution of disputes. The present Act fails to provide that predictability as it has been subject to extensive interpretations due to large number of ambiguities it contains. Different High Courts have taken different views on same issue. The apex court has also been changing its stand periodically on a number of issues, especially on issues of foreign seated arbitrations.

3. Catching up with time

The present act, nearly 20 years after, appears to be a complex and incomplete piece of legislation due to tremendous progress in the field of arbitration. For instance, it has failed to keep up with the notions of institutional arbitration [ICC/SIAC] and emergency arbitrators. Supreme Court has also held that the law of arbitration should be made simpler, more responsible and less technical in order to ensure justice to the parties. The Act needs to be amended to bring it in line with the new developments in the field.

4. Avoiding investment treaty claims

The amendment is needed to avert any future investment treaty claims which may arise under the notion of denial of justice or due to failure of India to provide effective means of justice to foreign investors. The White Industries Award against India was nothing less than a rude shock to the Government which forced it to revise its Model Bilateral Investment Treaty. However, while it may be acceptable to revisit the entire BIT mechanism, it is preferable to address the root cause of such claims i.e. unresponsive dispute resolution system as it exists in India. There is a dire need to make the process of adjudication of claims relating to foreign investors easy and efficient.

The Proposed Amendments

The Law Commission of India [LC], through its 246th Report, has suggested a number of amendments to the existing Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. It brings a lot of certainty in the act in matters of foreign arbitrations.

Firstly, the proposed amendment reforms the definition of international commercial arbitration by eliminating the reference to company. This will ensure that “residence” of a company will be determined by its place of incorporation and not by its place of management/control. Further, the proposal brings institutional arbitration into the legal framework within the act. This will encourage party to opt for institutional arbitration centers like ICC, LCIA and SIAC.

The LC, in its one of the finest recommendations, has proposed to make High Courts the Court of first instance to hear matters arising out an international commercial arbitration. This will decrease chances of an investment treaty claim against India while awarding easy and effective access to justice to foreign investors.

In a major relief to foreign investors, the power of the Indian Courts to interfere in foreign seated arbitration has been expressly reduced affirming the BALCO ruling of Supreme Court. Earlier, the Courts used to treat foreign seated arbitration on par with domestic arbitrations in many scenarios. The amendment, however, rightfully allows Indian Courts to exercise jurisdiction to grant interim reliefs even in a foreign seated arbitration. It has also been proposed that the scope of public policy for opposing the enforcement of foreign awards (Decision by a tribunal in a foreign seated arbitration) may be limited as compared to the scope for domestic awards. Now, a foreign award may be set aside on public policy grounds only if it conflicts with basic notions of morality or justice or goes against the fundamental policy of Indian law.

Another important proposal is to make matters of fraud expressly arbitrable following the judgment of Supreme Court in Swiss Timings. This will bring India on par with nations like Singapore and England which have developed themselves into preferred destinations for arbitration. Finally, the arbitrations will be time-barred and fixed fee affair if the LC report is accepted. This will ensure that proceedings are conducted timely and the issue of high costs is also addressed effectively.

Ensuring flow of foreign investments

There is no doubt that India needs foreign investment in order to ensure that Make-in-India is a success story. Foreign investments will flow, as stated above, only if a stable legal and business environment is ensured in the country. An efficient and effective dispute resolution mechanism is an integral element of a stable legal environment. There can be no complacency just because the investors are feeling positive about India because of the pro-business image of the NDA government.

While Prime Minister Modi has been quite successful in travelling around the globe and assuring foreign investors of a business friendly regime, it will not be helpful in long run if the dispute resolution mechanism remains the mess it is. It will be similar to entering a gunfight with a knife. Most of the changes suggested by the Law Commission are futuristic and well-intended. It is advisable to seriously consider the same and bring the amendment as soon as feasible.

Tags
editor's pick
Make in India
1996
Arbitration and Conciliation Act

Comments ↓

An Appeal...


 

Dear Reader,

 

As you are no doubt aware, Swarajya is a media product that is directly dependent on support from its readers in the form of subscriptions. We do not have the muscle and backing of a large media conglomerate nor are we playing for the large advertisement sweep-stake.

 

Our business model is you and your subscription.  And in challenging times like these, we need your support now more than ever.

 

We deliver over 10 - 15 high quality articles with expert insights and views. From 7AM in the morning to 10PM late night we operate to ensure you, the reader, get to see what is just right.

 

Becoming a Patron or a subscriber for as little as Rs 1200/year is the best way you can support our efforts.

Get Swarajya in your inbox.


Merchandise

Merchandise


    States

    Magazine


    Swarajya Magazine Cover Image

    Politics

    Not Like The Old Times: BJP's Feeble Victory In Rajasthan (Part I)

    Not Like The Old Times: BJP's Feeble Victory In Rajasthan (Part I)

    Venu Gopal Narayanan
    8h

    "Not Winning Solely On Modi's Popularity": Prashant Kishor Lists Out Four Reasons For BJP Victories In Three States

    Nishtha Anushree
    10h

    AIADMK Leadership Dispute: Madras High Court Rejects Sasikala's Bid For AIADMK Interim General Secretary Status

    Bhuvan Krishna
    12h

    Economy

    India Anticipated To Be Fastest Growing In Next Three Years, Set to Become Third Largest Economy By 2030: S&P

    India Anticipated To Be Fastest Growing In Next Three Years, Set to Become Third Largest Economy By 2030: S&P

    Nishtha Anushree
    14h

    Sensex Surpasses 69,000 For First Time As Investor Confidence Surges Post BJP Sweep In Three States

    Bhuvan Krishna
    16h

    Sensex, Nifty Close At All-Time High After BJP Victories In Three States, Record Surge Of Over 2 Per Cent

    Nishtha Anushree
    1d

    Defence

    On This Day, In 1971, Indian Navy Struck Pakistan's Naval Fleet At Karachi, Sank PNS Ghazi At Visakhapatnam, And Decimated Tanks In Longewala

    On This Day, In 1971, Indian Navy Struck Pakistan's Naval Fleet At Karachi, Sank PNS Ghazi At Visakhapatnam, And Decimated Tanks In Longewala

    Ujjwal Shrotryia
    11h

    On This Day, In 1971, Indian Air Force Struck Pakistani Installations For The Second Straight Day, Setting Stage For Historic Naval Raids On Karachi

    Ujjwal Shrotryia
    1d

    IAF's Mighty 'Mi-26,' Able To Lift Chinooks, Set For Overhaul With Russian Help

    Ujjwal Shrotryia
    2d

    World

    Moody's Downgrades China's Credit Ranking From Stable To Negative Citing Continuous Contraction Of Property Sector

    Moody's Downgrades China's Credit Ranking From Stable To Negative Citing Continuous Contraction Of Property Sector

    Nishtha Anushree
    10h

    Not Enough Joining US Military: Here's An Interesting Solution By A Senator — Let Illegal Immigrants Join, In Exchange For Citizenship

    Swarajya Staff
    16h

    Chinese Economic Crisis Deepens As Debt Defaults Reach Record High

    Swarajya Staff
    2d

    Culture

    'Celebrate At Home': Champat Rai Of Ram Janambhoomi Trust Urges Hindus Not To Visit Ayodhya On 22 January

    'Celebrate At Home': Champat Rai Of Ram Janambhoomi Trust Urges Hindus Not To Visit Ayodhya On 22 January

    Bhuvan Krishna
    16h

    'Animal': Sandeep Reddy Vanga 2 – Liberals 0

    K Balakumar
    3d

    Why The Insidious Anti-Hindu Communalism Of Certain Directors Goes Scot-Free

    Anonymous Contributor
    4d

    infrastructure


    Arun Kumar Das
    1

    Delhi-Meerut-Ghaziabad RRTS: Power Supply Commences Beyond Priority Section On Rapid Rail Corridor

    2 Mins Read
    Amit Mishra
    2

    Groove On The Go: Delhi Metro Unveils Pilot Project For Audio Ads And Jingles

    1 Mins Read
    Amit Mishra
    3

    Vadnagar: Airport In The Works For PM Modi's Hometown, Central Team To Study Feasibility

    2 Mins Read
    Amit Mishra
    4

    Delhi-Meerut RRTS Corridor Achieves 67 Per Cent Completion, On Course For 2025 Deadline

    2 Mins Read