
The Punjab and Haryana High Court yesterday (Wednesday, 28 November) issued a notice to the Union of India and the Union Territory Administration over Street Vendors Act, 2014 act as broad definition of the term ‘street vendor’ could result in chaos, reports The Tribune.
The bench comprising Chief Justice Krishna Murari and Justice Amit Rawal had noted that the existing definition allowed a street vendor to conduct his business ‘not only on streets but also on a lane, sidewalk, footpath, pavement, public park or any other public place or private area from a temporary built-up structure or by moving from place to place, including hawker, peddler and squatter’.
This would necessarily mean that pedestrians would be forced to walk on the road, leading to obstructions and congestion, and may even result in accidents.
The court had taken suo moto cognisance of the issue. The next date of hearing for the matter has been fixed on 18 January by the bench.
Justice Rawal also came down heavily on the unhygienic practices of street vendors, such as using adulterated water at tea stalls, utilising synthetic colours at food stalls, not ensuring proper garbage disposal etc. stating that such behaviour could even lead to an epidemic.
Also Read: Reclaiming The Pavement For The Pedestrian: Ten Ways To Implement This
An Appeal...
Dear Reader,
As you are no doubt aware, Swarajya is a media product that is directly dependent on support from its readers in the form of subscriptions. We do not have the muscle and backing of a large media conglomerate nor are we playing for the large advertisement sweep-stake.
Our business model is you and your subscription. And in challenging times like these, we need your support now more than ever.
We deliver over 10 - 15 high quality articles with expert insights and views. From 7AM in the morning to 10PM late night we operate to ensure you, the reader, get to see what is just right.
Becoming a Patron or a subscriber for as little as Rs 1200/year is the best way you can support our efforts.