A Supreme Court bench, comprising of the CJI (Chief Justice of India) Ranjan Gogoi and Justice S.K. Kaul, mentioned that the court was aware of 19 review petitions filed in connection with the Sabarimala verdict. The bench observed that it would decide tomorrow as to when the hearings on the review petitions will start in the court. The ANI reported this.
The Supreme Court, in its September 28 majority judgement (4:1), had decided in favour of allowing women in the menstrual age (10 - 50) to worship in the Sabarimala temple dedicated to the celibate deity, Aiyappa.
The bench was considering the submissions of lawyer Mathews J Nedumpara, who was seeking an urgent hearing to review the constitutional judgement. Nedumpura was representing the National Ayyappa Devotees Association which has deemed the decision as unconstitutional, void and in violation of the principles of natural justice. The judgment is vitiated by “errors apparent on the face of record”, the review petition stated.
The temple town on Sabarimala has been on a turmoil since it opened on Wednesday (18 October) for rituals. Many devotees, both men and women, have been staging protests against the attempt of the judiciary to rationalise faith.
As you are no doubt aware, Swarajya is a media product that is directly dependent on support from its readers in the form of subscriptions. We do not have the muscle and backing of a large media conglomerate nor are we playing for the large advertisement sweep-stake.
Our business model is you and your subscription. And in challenging times like these, we need your support now more than ever.
We deliver over 10 - 15 high quality articles with expert insights and views. From 7AM in the morning to 10PM late night we operate to ensure you, the reader, get to see what is just right.
Becoming a Patron or a subscriber for as little as Rs 999/year is the best way you can support our efforts.