Supreme Court while hearing the case of one Ajay Kumar on monthly maintenance and child support interpreted the law, giving judgement that even the brother-in-law is liable to pay maintenance to the victim under the Domestic Violence Act, if they have lived together under the same room as part of a joint family.
Ajay Kumar and his brother lived in their ancestral home on different floors and ran a shop together. After the death of his brother, Ajay stopped supporting his family. They were also not permitted to live in the same house. Ajay approached the sessions court in 2015 and lost the case, he was eventually ordered to pay Rs 4,000 a month maintenance and Rs 2,000 towards child support of his dead brothers family, in a report by The Hindu.
The apex court in its nine-page order defined the term ‘domestic relationship’ and said “relationship where two persons live or have lived together at any point of time in a shared household when they are related by consanguinity, marriage or through a relationship in the nature of marriage, adoption or are members living together as a joint family.”
The court found that the widow and child are well within the law in asking Ajay to support them and he is liable to pay the maintenance.
As you are no doubt aware, Swarajya is a media product that is directly dependent on support from its readers in the form of subscriptions. We do not have the muscle and backing of a large media conglomerate nor are we playing for the large advertisement sweep-stake.
Our business model is you and your subscription. And in challenging times like these, we need your support now more than ever.
We deliver over 10 - 15 high quality articles with expert insights and views. From 7AM in the morning to 10PM late night we operate to ensure you, the reader, get to see what is just right.
Becoming a Patron or a subscriber for as little as Rs 999/year is the best way you can support our efforts.