India’s ‘Most Famous Historian’ Sees No Irony In Using Ambedkar, Who Advocated Full Population Transfer, To Oppose CAA
 India’s ‘Most Famous Historian’ Sees No Irony In Using Ambedkar, Who Advocated Full Population Transfer, To Oppose CAAHistorian Ram Guha arguing with cops (Pic via Twitter)

Historian Ramachandra Guha yesterday (19 December) took to the streets to protest against the Citizenship Amendment Act (CAA) by calling it a violation of India’s democratic principles.

During the protest, Guha held high Ambedkar’s poster which read, “CAA against constitution”, in one hand while frantically opposing the act which he described as totally discriminatory and anti-constitutional. In the same breath he also alleged that the bill threatens Hindu-Muslim plurality.

Despite being a prominent historian, the irony of using Ambedkar to peddle these arguments under the anti-CAA agenda, was lost on Guha.

One of the predominant criticisms of the act by so-called intellectuals has been what they call an exclusion of Muslims from the act - despite them not being “persecuted minorities” in neighbouring Islamic countries.

Their key demand gives birth to a scenario of Muslim immigrants from countries like Pakistan, Bangladesh and even Myanmar getting Indian citizenship - thus “furthering” the so-called Hindu-Muslim plurality which Guha advocates.

It should be noted that B R Ambedkar though was vehemently opposed to such a scenario and had advocated a full exchange of population at the time of partition by arguing that Islam would never allow a true Muslim to consider either India as his motherland or a Hindu as his kith or kin.

As quoted here Ambedkar had famously written, “To the Muslim ibi bene ibi patria is unthinkable. Wherever there is the rule of Islam, there is his own country. In other words, Islam can never allow a true Muslim to adopt India as his motherland and regard a Hindu as his kith and kin. That is probably the reason why Maulana Mahomed Ali, a great Indian but a true Muslim, preferred to be buried in Jerusalem rather than in India.”

As amply clear from the above text, while Guha passionately advocated for “Hindu-Muslim plurality”, Ambedkar had negated the possibility of that ever happening.

Various twitter users then proceeded to point out this irony:

Incidentally, the irony is also lost on the Bhim Army Chandrashekhar Azad who had led a similar protest in front of Jama Masjid while holding an Ambedkar poster.

An Appeal...

Dear Reader,

As you are no doubt aware, Swarajya is a media product that is directly dependent on support from its readers in the form of subscriptions. We do not have the muscle and backing of a large media conglomerate nor are we playing for the large advertisement sweep-stake.

Our business model is you and your subscription. And in challenging times like these, we need your support now more than ever.

We deliver over 10 - 15 high quality articles with expert insights and views. From 7AM in the morning to 10PM late night we operate to ensure you, the reader, get to see what is just right.

Becoming a Patron or a subscriber for as little as Rs 1200/year is the best way you can support our efforts.

Become A Patron
Become A Subscriber