Insta
Supreme Court To Deliver Verdict On Permanent Commission For Women Officers In Indian Navy Today
IANS
Mar 17, 2020, 08:16 AM | Updated 08:16 AM IST
Save & read from anywhere!
Bookmark stories for easy access on any device or the Swarajya app.
The Supreme Court will deliver judgment on permanent commission for women officers in the navy on Tuesday (17 March). It follows a verdict by the apex court in favour of permanent commission for women officer in the army.
The Bench, headed by Justice D Y Chandrachud, will deliver the judgement at 10.30 am. The women officers had contended in the apex court that the gender-based classification was always justified by governments across the world with inane explanations, and they would do anything to justify their discriminatory behaviour.
Aishwarya Bhati, counsel for women officers seeking permanent commission in navy, said her client's case was similar to the one propounded by the Babita Puniya judgement, where the apex court directed the Centre to grant permanent commission to all women officers in three months.
The petitioner was commissioned in the navy on 6 August 2007, in the JAG branch and is the only SSC JAG branch officer.
"Both the navy as well as the army wanted to apply the policy of grant of permanent commission prospectively, excluding the serving women officers," Bhati said.
She contended before the court that her client's application was rejected because she was prior to the policy, but the applications of her male colleagues were accepted.
Bhati said inherent discrimination was prevalent in the working of administrations and supported justifications offered to prevent women from attaining permanent commission, seniority in cases of national security, and reduction of number for direct recruitment.
The lawyer said slightly different shade of reasons given to deny the benefit of the policy of permanent commission to serving women officers of the navy bear an uncanny resemblance to the issues of mindset and stereotypes, in the case of the women officers of the army.
"These misconceived reasons are being masqueraded as organisational issues to scuttle and deny the right of rationality, equality, and equal opportunities and deserve to be rejected completely and outrightly, in the same manner," she told the court.
(This story has been published from a wire agency feed without modifications to the text. Only the headline has been changed.)
Save & read from anywhere!
Bookmark stories for easy access on any device or the Swarajya app.
Introducing ElectionsHQ + 50 Ground Reports Project
The 2024 elections might seem easy to guess, but there are some important questions that shouldn't be missed.
Do freebies still sway voters? Do people prioritise infrastructure when voting? How will Punjab vote?
The answers to these questions provide great insights into where we, as a country, are headed in the years to come.
Swarajya is starting a project with an aim to do 50 solid ground stories and a smart commentary service on WhatsApp, a one-of-a-kind. We'd love your support during this election season.
Click below to contribute.