Vijay Mallya Is Just A Small Part Of The Banking Problem

Vijay Mallya Is Just A Small Part Of The Banking ProblemVijay Mallya (Mark Thompson/Getty Images)
Snapshot
  • Mallya’s debts are a very small portion of the total amount of money owed by various corporates to Indian banks.

    The gross non-performing assets (NPAs) ratio has more than doubled between 2012-13 and 15 December 2015 from 3.22 percent to 6.78 percent.

    Mallya apart, what about the other corporates who have borrowed from banks and are now not repaying their loans?

If media coverage were to be a reflection of the scale of any problem, then it can safely be said that Vijay Mallya is single-handedly responsible for the crisis in the Indian banking sector.

But that is clearly not the case.

Mallya owes Indian banks around Rs 9,000 crore. This is a very small portion of the total amount of money owed by various corporates to Indian banks. Minister of State for Finance Jayant Sinha shared some interesting data in a written reply to a question in the Lok Sabha, on 11 March 2016.

The accompanying table shows us how big the problem of banks’ lending to corporates actually is.

Vijay Mallya Is Just A Small Part Of The Banking Problem

The gross non-performing assets (NPAs) ratio has more than doubled between 2012-13 and 15 December 2015. It has jumped from 3.22 percent to 6.78 percent. The gross NPAs ratio is essentially obtained by dividing gross non-performing assets by gross advances, or total loans given by the banks, in this case to corporates.

And how do we define gross non-performing assets? According to the Reserve Bank of India, “An asset…becomes non performing when it ceases to generate income for the bank.” When the corporate borrower stops paying interest and repaying the principal on a loan (a loan is an asset for a bank), the bank typically allows for a grace period of 90 days. After this grace period is over, the bank categorises the loan as a non-performing asset and starts setting aside money (or making provisions) for it. The total sum of such loans forms the gross-non-performing assets.

It is worth remembering here that a loan being categorised as a gross non-performing asset does not mean that all is lost for the bank when it comes to that particular loan. The bank can recover money from the asset that has been offered as a collateral against the loan. Of course, this is not as straightforward as it sounds.

In Mallya’s case, he has also given personal guarantees to banks while taking loans for Kingfisher Airlines. Mallya owes around Rs 9,000 crore to banks. This is a very small amount if one compares it to the gross-non-performing assets of corporate lending carried out by banks.

As on 15 December 2015, it was at Rs 2,60,653 crore, though this figure has bloated since after many public sector banks aggressively disclosed their bad loan in the December quarter. Still, using the official figures till 15 December, Mallya’s Rs 9,000 crore works out to around 3.5 percent of total corporate gross non-performing assets. The percentage would be even lower if we compare it to total gross non-performing assets.

Also, Credit Suisse, in a report released in October 2015, identifies some of the biggest corporates who are having a tough time repaying the money they borrowed from banks. Credit Suisse analysts (Ashish Gupta, Kush Shah and Prashant Kumar) had this to say in their report: “Going through the annual reports available for ‘House of Debt’ companies, we find instances where auditors have highlighted that the company has been in default for a period of up to 360 days. According to their auditors’ report, eight of the ten ‘House of Debt’ groups were in default last year. Total debt with these companies in default was at US$53 billion (48% of total debt with the groups) of which US$37 billion were reported to be in default for 0-90 days by the auditors.

The corporates which form the House of Debt group are as follows—Adani Group, Essar Group, GVK group, GMR group, Jaypee Group, JSW Group, Lanco Group, Reliance ADAG, Vedanta Group and Videocon Group.

Hence, the point is that the mess in the Indian banking sector is substantially bigger than just Vijay Mallya. It’s just that Mallya with his flashy lifestyle has become the poster boy for these corporates who have borrowed from banks and are now not in a position to repay.

Finance Minister Arun Jaitley has been very vociferous about Mallya and has said: “The facts are very clear: Every government agency will take strong action against him. Banks will go all out to recover every single penny.”

Indeed, that is great. Nevertheless, the question is why just Mallya? What about the other corporates who have borrowed from banks and are now not repaying their loans? They owe the banks close to Rs 2,51,000 crore. Mallya owes just Rs 9,000 crore.

Why is the same aggression missing when it comes to the other borrowers?

The nation wants to know.

Comments

Latest Articles

    Artboard 4Created with Sketch.