What Does A Trump Victory Mean For The Future Of US And Financial Markets?



What Does A Trump Victory Mean For The Future Of US And Financial Markets?(DANIEL LEAL-OLIVAS/AFP/Getty Images) 
Snapshot
  • The election of Trump is repudiation of the liberal indifference to economic stagnation, income inequality and the diminishing economic prospects for American families, which have clouded over the US during the two terms of President Barack Obama.

After an unremittingly ugly and fractious campaign that exposed deep rifts in American society, Donald Trump has won the 2016 US presidential election to become the 45th President of the country. The last time a right-wing anti-establishment candidate made it to the White House was in 1829, when Andrew Jackson became the country’s seventh president.

Like Trump, Jackson made his fortune in real estate. Like Trump, Jackson had a captivating style of speech and wild hair and demanded respect. In an 1806 duel, he shot and killed a man who had insulted him in a newspaper. By comparison, Trump’s Twitter broadsides appear more forgiving. Like Trump, Jackson ran as an outside candidate. In the 1824 election, the Democratic-Republican party (the only national party in the country) at its caucus nominated William H Crawford, but Andrew Jackson’s supporters claimed the caucus “ignored the voice of the people”. Refusing to accept the nomination, Jackson’s supporters held their own convention, and nominated Jackson as their candidate. In the national election that followed, when the popular votes were tallied, Andrew Jackson had defeated his fellow contestants – William Crawford, Henry Clay and John Quincy Adams, but the electoral votes were split, giving no candidate a majority. As the law demanded, the decision to choose the president was left to the House of Representatives – the house chose John Quincy Adams. Jackson didn’t give up and eventually won the 1829 election.

When supporters talk about why they love Trump, they say it’s because he says what he thinks, without calculation or political correctness. The election of Trump is repudiation of the liberal indifference to economic stagnation, income inequality and the diminishing economic prospects for American families, which have clouded over the US during the two terms of President Barack Obama. The slowest recovery on record since the financial crisis of 2008, has delivered a gross domestic product (GDP) growth of approximately +2 per cent, half of previous recoveries. In Tuesday’s vote, Americans have refused to accept this status quo as the best the US can do. They longed for a leader who would not “manage the stagnation/decline” but fight to restore growth and “make America great again.”

It’s a different matter if Trump can be that leader or indeed can restore growth to the levels of the past. A lot of issues with anaemic US GDP growth has to do with demographics and technological changes. Gone are the days when an average American graduating from high school could walk across the street and get a job.

  1. Manufacturing employment peaked in June 1979 at 19.5 million. Since then, manufacturing employment has declined by 7.3 million or 37.3 per cent – to its current level of 12.3 million, even though the US manufactures twice as much.
  2. The real median household income of an American householder, who has completed four years of high school peaked in 1973 at $56,395 in constant 2013 dollars. By 2013, it was down to $40,701. That is a drop of $15,694 or 27.8 per cent.
  3. In June 1979, when manufacturing employment hit its peak, government employment was 16 million. Since then, government employment has increased by 6.2 million or 38.6 per cent to its current level of 22.2 million. A large and growing state sector is never a good sign for economic growth.

Trump ran an unconventional campaign based on anger, blame and colourful words and triumphed over Hillary Clinton’s campaign – which spent most of its firepower attempting to disqualify Trump based on his character. Voters rejected the progressive agendas of Clinton and Barack Obama, much of which have stifled economic growth for the past eight years with over-regulation and legislative gridlock.

So what does a Trump victory mean for the future and the financial markets?

  1. An End To Legislative Gridlock: With the Republicans now in control of the White House, the Senate and the House of Representatives, we can potentially say goodbye to legislative gridlock that has plagued Washington since 2010. This is growth-supportive. As a businessman, Trump has a history and experience of delegating authority to those best able to do certain tasks. Look for Vice-President-elect Mike Pence to shoulder significant duties and make the President’s domestic agenda run smoother. Trump, if anything, is delegator-in-chief.
  2. Trade Deals: Trump can of course use executive orders should he wish to act on his electoral promises immediately after being sworn in. Top of the list – trade policy. Trump has said that he would like to withdraw the US from certain trade deals, and “impose tariffs” on some of the US’s trading partners. If Trump were to impose tariffs on China, Mexico and South Korea, this could spark a trade war and even tip the US into recession, given the current anaemic growth rate. The probability of this outcome is very low but not zero.
  3. Taxes: Trump has broached the topics of a lower tax rate for both corporations and workers as well as a provision to repatriate $2 trillion of US corporate earnings held overseas, by taxing it on a one-time basis at roughly 10 per cent. This could entice US companies to bring cash back onshore, as well as encourage them to keep future earnings onshore, if corporation tax were cut alongside. Trump pledged to cut the top marginal corporation tax rate to 15 per cent from 35 per cent. This would be a big boost to growth and consumption if followed through in its entirety.
  4. Looser Fiscal Policy: Trump has called for major defence spending increases, which would probably include strengthening defensive homeland security as well as offensive capabilities. This could signal a reversal from the Obama Administration, which allowed defence spending to decline. Industrial and defence companies would be big beneficiaries.
  5. Infrastructure: It’s going to be more than just a wall across the US-Mexico border. Trump has talked about an infrastructure plan of at least $500 billion, based on his informal pledge to “double” what his opponent Clinton campaigned on.
  6. The US Federal Reserve (Fed): The Fed is now unlikely to raise rates at its December meeting given the high degree of policy uncertainty around trade, immigration and fiscal measures and their impact on the US economy. Overall, I believe Trump’s policies, when they come into effect, are likely to be inflationary and the Fed will have its day to raise rates. Hurrying with a rate rise now would be inadvisable. Despite Trump’s broadside against the Fed and its Chair, Janet Yellen, I expect Yellen to stick out her role at the Fed until the end of her term in February 2018.
  7. Contagion: The political contagion from this election is going to be monumental. First Brexit and now this. Anti-globalisation, anti-elite and anti-political correctness that we have seen in Brexit campaign and the US presidential election is here to stay. Trump’s electoral success is likely to embolden populist movements in Europe in what is an incredibly busy next 12 months of elections in Europe. The first test of this will be on 4 December, when Italy goes to the polls in a referendum on constitutional reform. A referendum that Prime Minister Matteo Renzi is likely to lose (if polls are to be believed) and his government risks being replaced by the anti-European, populist Five Star Movement. Mainstream and centrist politicians in the Netherlands, France and Germany will be tested in the national election being held there in 2017. Brexit and the US election have already shaped the mainstream political discourse in the Western world irreversibly. A Marine Le Pen victory in France may still be improbable. But it would be a grave mistake to rule it out.

Where To Invest?

You will recall my comment in the October Newsletter – where I mentioned that the average compound annual growth rate for US equities since 1945 had been +9.7 per cent under Democratic presidents and +6.7 per cent under Republicans. However, the best market returns were generated under Republican presidents, working with a Republican controlled Congress. In that scenario, the S&P 500 Index gained +15.1 per cent annually. Therefore, now that we have Republicans controlling the White House and Congress, US equities will be a good medium to long term play. However, one has to be patient, since 'President' Trump, will not be in office until 20 January 2017 and the rally in equities will not be sustainable until GDP growth accelerates.

I would recommend buying the dips in any equity sell-off, particularly in US equities and to stay away from emerging market equities for now. Trump’s policies, including tax cuts/reforms, fiscal spending, and cutting regulations are stimulative. However, his anti-globalisation trade policies are negative, not just for the US, but for the rest of the world as well. If Trump is wise enough to surround himself with clever advisers and follow the example of president Ronald Reagan, who adopted the reform agenda that former Congressman Jack Kemp and other House Republicans had prepared (and such a ready-made agenda is awaiting in the House Republican's “Better Way” plan), then don’t be surprised to see a +4 per cent GDP growth in the US late in 2017.

Emerging markets equities are particularly vulnerable to a strong dollar against emerging markets currencies. I am also not a big believer in European equities given the risks of the upcoming Italian referendum.

Euro/dollar will likely stay bid and in the 1.08-1.15 range for the rest of the year as a US rate rise view recedes and European Central Bank signals pulling away from more quantitative easing, British pound/US dollar will likely trade in the 1.23-1.28 range.

Any sell-off in bonds is an opportunity to buy and lock in higher yields. However, be mindful of the duration of your investments, as President Trump’s policy will be growth stimulative in the medium term and rate rise pressures could start building late in 2017.

The US equity sectors to be long: financials as a yield curve steeping trade which would add to banks earnings; industrials; materials, on the back of “make America great again” and Healthcare, now that Clinton’s scare for the sector is gone.

Manish Singh is the Chief Investment Officer at Crossbridge Capital in London. He tweets at @manish_05singh.

Comments

Latest Articles

    Artboard 4Created with Sketch.