Budget Hike In Gold Import Duty: A Recipe That Will Increase Smuggling Of The Precious Metal
A hike in the customs duty on gold imports is unexpected.
The move will encourage smuggling and under-invoicing, both of which would deny revenue to the government.
Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman’s maiden Budget presented in the Parliament today (Friday, 5 July) has a proposal that has been contrary to what most were expecting --- a hike in customs duty on gold imports.
In fact, the Finance Minister has raised the duty on all precious metals, which could prove to be unpopular among women who love jewellery. The Budget proposes to increase customs duty on gold to 12.5 per cent from 10 per cent. This proposal also covers all forms, including unwrought and unrefined gold.
Similarly, Sitharaman has proposed to increase import duty on all forms of silver by a similar margin besides platinum, a precious metal that is gaining popularity of late. The Budget also plans to impose a 12.5 per cent tax on all precious metals.
In terms of actual rise in cost for a person buying jewellery, the proposal may not pinch much. For example, if a person is buying gold jewellery with gold priced at Rs 33,000 per 10 grams, then he/she would be paying an additional Rs 825.
But the move has other undesirable consequences such as encouraging smuggling. For a country that had enjoyed an import duty of four per cent on gold imports in 2011, the 12.5 per cent is seen as a huge difference.
What the initial increase in import duty has done is to encourage smuggling of gold in the country. Smuggling of gold has gone up four times since 2013, when the duty was raised to 10 per cent. According to the World Gold Council, an organisation of gold producers, about 100 tonnes of gold were smuggled into the country last year. The American Bullion Association says at least 750 kg of gold is being smuggled into the country every day.
The Finance Minister could have raised the duty to net additional revenue but probably, it could stand to lose more. A lower duty will always see better compliance. The fact that India is one of the largest consumers of the yellow metal would mean the government could have looked at enhanced revenue. Maybe, a two percentage point cut could have done the trick.
Smuggling only denies the government its revenue. For India, the other problem is that while its agencies have to pay a premium to buy gold, countries in West Asia, particularly the United Arab Emirates, get the yellow metal at a discount. Thus, a person smuggling gold into the country has a lot to gain.
Besides smuggling, the higher duty can also lead to under-invoicing of consignments, again depriving the government of precious revenue.
Probably, Sitharaman was looking to discourage gold imports and tap the huge amount of gold available in various forms such as jewellery and gold coins across the country with individuals, trusts and temples. But the country lacks a good policy on gold, to tap the idling precious metal.
It is unfortunate that the Finance Minister has chosen to hike import duty on gold that would only further fuel smuggling rather than rein it in through lower duty or other such measures. Probably, a new policy on gold, which will also promote the precious metal as an asset, is in the offing but it will be better for the government to come out with it without any further delay.
As you are no doubt aware, Swarajya is a media product that is directly dependent on support from its readers in the form of subscriptions. We do not have the muscle and backing of a large media conglomerate nor are we playing for the large advertisement sweep-stake.
Our business model is you and your subscription. And in challenging times like these, we need your support now more than ever.
We deliver over 10 - 15 high quality articles with expert insights and views. From 7AM in the morning to 10PM late night we operate to ensure you, the reader, get to see what is just right.
Becoming a Patron or a subscriber for as little as Rs 1200/year is the best way you can support our efforts.