Infrastructure

Coal-Based Thermal Power Plants Ignoring Pollution Control Measures In Delhi-NCR: CSE Report

Arun Kumar Das

Nov 26, 2023, 09:55 AM | Updated 12:30 PM IST

Smoke billows out of one of the cooling towers after a fire broke out at a thermal power plant in Chanda of Maharashtra’s Chandrapur district.
Smoke billows out of one of the cooling towers after a fire broke out at a thermal power plant in Chanda of Maharashtra’s Chandrapur district.

A new report by Centre for Science and Environment (CSE) says that the ongoing air pollution in Delhi-NCR is being worsened by the intransigence of thermal power plants, most of which are not complying with emission control norms.

"Delhi and NCR cannot meet the clean air benchmark and protect public health if the continuous sources of pollution like thermal power plants remain high emitters. These plants have not been able to meet the standards and are at varying stages of progress simply because the target dates for compliance are shifting continually,” says Anumita Roychowdhury, Executive Director, Research and Advocacy, CSE.

Delhi-National capital region (NCR) has 11 thermal power plants. The CSE analysis focuses on particulate matter, nitrogen oxide and sulphur dioxide emissions by these coal-based thermal power plants.

The analysis is based on the environmental status reports of these plants accessed from the website of Central Electricity Authority, a technical arm of the Union Ministry of Power, from April 2022 to August 2023.

A History Of Delays

The Union Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change (MoEFCC) had introduced strict emission norms for coal-based power plants in December 2015 — to be complied within two years.

Since then, the norms have been diluted for several parameters and deadlines have been repeatedly delayed.

On the lapse of the first deadline of December 2017, a five-year extension was granted to all thermal power plants (TPP) except the ones in Delhi-NCR. Because of high levels of pollution in the region, the plants in NCR were tasked to comply by 2019.

Except the Dadri TPP and the Mahatma Gandhi TPP, all the plants in NCR failed to meet the revised deadline and continued to operate in violation of the norms till another extension of the deadline was given in March 2021.

At this time, the ministry classified all power plants, including the ones in NCR, under three different categories — A, B and C — based on the criteria defined by the Central Pollution Control Board.

According to the new deadlines:

  • Category A plants can meet (sulphur-di-oxide) SO2 emission norms by 31 December 2024.

  • Category B plants can meet SO2 emission norms by 31 December 2025.

  • Category C plants can meet SO2 emission norms by 31 December 2026.

Based on the new criteria, except for four plants — the Dadri, Indira Gandhi, Mahatma Gandhi and Panipat TPPs — the remaining seven plants were placed under category C, giving them more time to comply with the norms.

Because of these extensions in deadline, Panipat TPP remains the only plant that is unlikely to meet the emission norms by the compliance deadline.

However, says Nivit Yadav, Programme Director, Industrial Pollution, CSE, “This clearly does not imply that the emissions from other plants are anywhere within the prescribed limits, as we see in our current analysis.”

High Emissions Spiking Pollution In NCR

Almost eight years after introduction of the notification on emission norms, and six years after the first deadline, three plants in the NCR — Harduaganj thermal power station of UPRVUNL, Panipat Thermal Power Plant of HPGCL, and Guru Hargobind TPP (Lehra Mohabbat) of PSPCL — are still reporting very high suspended particulate matter emissions, finds the CSE report.

Says Yadav, “Minor changes in operational parameters and regular maintenance of electrostatic precipitators can make substantial improvement in compliance of power plants where SPM norms are not being met continuously.”

Nitrogen oxide norms have already been relaxed by the government: nearly all the plants should be able to meet these norms with proper operational intelligence and with the assistance of the original equipment manufacturers to carry out necessary modifications in the plant boilers, point out CSE researchers.

Despite the relaxation in norms and deadlines, four plants­ — Panipat TPS, Rajiv Gandhi TPP and Yamunanagar TPP in Haryana and Guru Hargobind TPP (Lehra Mohabbat) in Punjab — have exceeded the nitrogen oxide norms several times during the reporting period.

In the case of sulphur dioxide, the Mahatma Gandhi TPP is the only power plant in NCR where the norms are within the prescribed limit.

Dadri TPP is another plant that has sulphur dioxide control equipment (FGD) in place, but the plant has reported high SO2 readings 86 per cent of the times during the reporting period — the reason could be either FGDs not in service or of inadequate capacity, or very high sulphur content of the coal being used.

All the coal power plants in NCR have reported SO2 emissions up to three times over the prescribed limits.

According to Dr D D Basu, former director, CPCB, “SO2 is a reactive gas and converts to sulphates in the form of fine particulate matter — PM2.5 — which poses even a greater risk to health and environment. Therefore, control of SO2 is crucial from the perspective of controlling particulate matter emissions.”

Says Yadav, “CSE has been tracking and reporting on the status of implementation of the emission norms since its introduction in 2015. We have been advocating strict emission norms for coal power plants much before these were introduced by the MoEFCC."

Roychowdhury adds, “Instead of delaying the timeline, there should be more focus on the enablers in terms of strong compliance and deterrence mechanisms as well as incentives and a one-time support for fast tracking change and for time-bound implementation. This is a critical regional strategy for the cleaning up of the airshed.”


Get Swarajya in your inbox.


Magazine


image
States