A view of a United Nations Security Council meeting in New York. (BRYAN R SMITH/AFP/GettyImages)As Bashar Al Assad’s army and Syrian rebels clash to take control of Aleppo, members of the United Nations voted on a UN General Assembly resolution demanding an immediate ceasefire in Syria. India, along with 35 other countries abstained from voting.
One of the most important force behind India’s decision to not support the resolution was its traditional approach of not mixing humanitarian issues with international politics. However, there are two cold realities of geopolitics that explain India’s take on the crisis better.
First, India has enjoyed good relations with Syria. The country, which was suspended by the Organisation of Islamic Cooperation (OIC) in 2012 for “suppressing” the Syrian revolt, has supported India’s stand on Kashmir. OIC, which hosts some of the most authoritarian Islamist regimes, has also criticised India over “alleged human rights violations” in Kashmir.
Second, New Delhi wishes to maintain a balance between India’s relationship with the United States and Russia. While it draws closer to the United States in the defence sphere, India wants to ensure that its relationship with Russia remains cordial.
An Appeal...
Dear Reader,
As you are no doubt aware, Swarajya is a media product that is directly dependent on support from its readers in the form of subscriptions. We do not have the muscle and backing of a large media conglomerate nor are we playing for the large advertisement sweep-stake.
Our business model is you and your subscription. And in challenging times like these, we need your support now more than ever.
We deliver over 10 - 15 high quality articles with expert insights and views. From 7AM in the morning to 10PM late night we operate to ensure you, the reader, get to see what is just right.
Becoming a Patron or a subscriber for as little as Rs 1200/year is the best way you can support our efforts.