News Brief
Kuldeep Negi
Feb 27, 2024, 01:57 PM | Updated 01:57 PM IST
Save & read from anywhere!
Bookmark stories for easy access on any device or the Swarajya app.
In a viral moment that has captured global attention, a British House of Lords member faced a pointed reality check on the topic of 'territorial integrity' during a heated exchange at the Raisina Dialogue in New Delhi.
In a video clip of the exchange, Lord Peter Mandelson, a British politician, while addressing the attendees during a debate, chided the "so-called" Global South on the principles of territorial integrity and anti-colonialism.
However, his response was met with pointed criticism from another participants.
"My great idea is for everyone in the United Nations, including the countries of the so called Global South to rediscover the ideal of anti-colonial solidarity and show very, very firmly indeed their position against the imperial war in Ukraine," Mandelson said.
Samir Saran, President of the Observer Research Foundation, and Maneesh Gobin, Foreign Minister of Mauritius, were quick to point out the irony in Mandelson's remarks.
Saran underscored the contradiction of a British Lord lecturing on anti-colonialism as the UK was a major colonial power for centuries, while Gobin questioned why the principles of territorial integrity did not seem to apply to the Chagos Archipelago, a territory that has been a point of contention between the United Kingdom and Mauritius.
"It's kind of ironic where that came from," Saran said, referring to the colonial past of the United Kingdom.
"Territorial integrity should apply equally to the Chagos Archipelago. Territorial integrity should not apply with one set of rules in a particular area of the world and not apply with the same set of rules in another area of the world," Gobin said in response to the British MP.
Brutal takedown at @raisinadialogue. âLordâ Mandelson lectures the âso calledâ global south on âterritorial integrity & anti-colonialismâ. @samirsaran pointed out the irony of it coming from a British Lord & @ManeeshGobin asked why it didnât apply to the Chagos Archipelago. pic.twitter.com/vFO0V62gjr
— Abhijit Iyer-Mitra (@Iyervval) February 27, 2024
The Chagos Archipelago, located in the Indian Ocean, has been at the heart of a long-standing dispute over sovereignty and human rights. In the 1960s and 1970s, the indigenous population was forcibly removed by the British government to make way for a US military base on Diego Garcia, one of the islands.
Mauritius has since sought to regain control over the archipelago, arguing that it was illegally detached from its territory prior to independence.
In recent years, there have been several rulings by international courts and bodies, including the International Court of Justice (ICJ) and the United Nations, urging the United Kingdom to facilitate the return of the Chagossians and to cede the control of the archipelago to Mauritius, which claims sovereignty over it.
However, Britain has not complied with the ICJ's advisory opinion or the UN resolution, maintaining that it has every right to hold onto the islands until 2036, as per an agreement with the United States regarding the military base on Diego Garcia.
Also Read: India's Poverty Rate Dipped To 4.5-5 Per Cent In 2022-23: SBI Research
Kuldeep is Senior Editor (Newsroom) at Swarajya. He tweets at @kaydnegi.