Modi Finger-Prints Seen In Prabhu’s Rail Budget 2016; Here Are 8 Key Takeaways
- First look at the railway budget: not quite there in terms of the four objectives Suresh Prabhu set out for himself last year.
- But the direction is the right one, and the journey has begun in earnest.
- Here are 8 key takeaways from the railway budget.
A first look at Suresh Prabhu’s 2016-17 Railway Budget suggests that despite some slippages on financial performance due to a sluggish economy, the organisation is on the road to recovery and redirection. It is not quite there in terms of the four objectives Prabhu set out for himself last year – boost investment significantly, improve safety, enhance user experience, and ensure economic sustainability – but the direction is the right one, and the journey has begun in earnest.
The rail budget presented today (25 February) has all the finger-prints of Narendra Modi himself, with the sheer number of alliterative initiatives being a dead giveaway. Prabhu, for example, talked of Nav Arjan, Nav Manak and Nav Rachna – meaning new revenues, new norms, and new structures. Modi surely must have had a hand in this formulation, with supportive evidence coming from his sanguine expression throughout the speech.
The most important headline in
tomorrow’s newspapers will be that there is no fare or freight hike, but this
may not matter much since it is always possible to make these hikes later,
outside the railway budget – as was done in the last two years. However,
freight hikes are unlikely to be resorted to, since the objective is to raise
the railways’ share of freight traffic.
The key financial slippage is in
freight, where last year’s budget target has been missed by a mile – by Rs
15,744 crore, to be precise – due to a weak core sector. But with expenses
falling due to savings on fuel and energy, the surpluses (excess of receipts
over expenses) were a reasonable Rs 11,402 crore. But some sleight of hand is
visible even here, in the reductions of Rs 400 crore in pension fund contributions
and Rs 2,400 crore in depreciation.
The second major slippage is the drop
in the operating ratio – a measure of profitability – from the targeted 88.5
percent to around 90 percent. But next year will be worse (92 percent), thanks
largely to the payout on the seventh pay commission. If Prabhu misses again
next time and slips beyond 92 percent on the operating ratio, it would be a bad
signal on the viability of the railway system.
However, Prabhu has come up trumps on
his investment targets, with the play outlay of Rs 1,00,011 crore set to be hit
– almost bulls-eye. Since Prabhu’s railways have to generate both growth
momentum and jobs, this is good news.
For next year (2016-17), he has
promised a capital budget of Rs 1,21,000 crore. While this is good, it is not
good enough to realise the investment target of Rs 8,50,000 crore by 2019-20.
The resources and spending will have to be augmented dramatically to hit that
kind of target – nearly Rs 2,00,000 crore every year for the next three years. A
tall order, possible only if the economy starts growing faster.
Prabhu’s rail budget looks better
from the front windshield than the rear-view mirror. The following are key
shifts in emphasis worth noting, though some were announced earlier:
there is a shift from mere announcements of new lines and projects in favour of
execution. This is very important from the view of improving railway finances,
since yields tend to be higher in routes where freight demand already exists,
rather than in new, uneconomic routes. For example, in 2015-16, the rate of
laying broad gauge lines has risen from 4.3 km a day to 7 km; the idea is to
raise this to 13 km a day by 2017-18, and further to 19 km a day the year after
– the year of the next general election. If Nitin Gadkari also pushes up his
rate of laying new highways to 20-30 km by then, employment generation will
start booming. Prabhu said his plans will create nine crore mandays and 14
crore mandays of work in these two years. Another important thrust area is
electrification – which improves the railways’ pulling capacity at lower costs
and less environmental impact. Both augur well for railway finances and the
economy. Pandering to populist demands for new lines has almost ended.
like Vajpayee’s Golden Quadrilateral highways project, Narendra Modi is trying
to do a Diamond Quadrilateral in railways. Apart from the existing proposed
freight corridors (Delhi to Mumbai), and Delhi to Kharagpur (near Kolkata), north-south
(Delhi-Chennai), east-west (Kharagpur-Mumbai) and east coast (Kharagpur-Vijayawada)
corridors are in the works. They won’t happen in a hurry, but a start will be
made during Modi’s five-year tenure. They will be completed only if he gets a
The only leg missing in the quadrilateral
is the west coast freight corridor, where the western ghats provide a
formidable challenge, as was seen during the laying of the Konkan Railway. The
key challenge is funding, especially since Prabhu wants states and private
investors to chip in with some finances. Right now the easy money is coming
from the Life Insurance Corporation, which has promised Rs 1,50,000 crore over
an important shift promised is zero-base budgeting. This is a major
announcement, which means that projects and costs will be repeatedly evaluated every
year (or more frequently) to ensure that they continue to make economic sense. In
the past, bad projects were persisted with merely because so much time and
effort had been invested in them; now, the attempt will be to cull projects
that no longer make commercial sense, cutting out losses.
targets are being made more reasonable. After failing with high targeting on
freight, where 85 million tonnes of additional freight was planned this year
(2015-16), next year’s targeted increase is lower at 50 million tonnes,
assuming that the worst may be over for large freight movers like coal, steel,
cement, and other bulk commodities. That remains to be seen, but the move to
realistic targeting is important.
the focus on investment remains. The plan for next year is Rs 1.21 lakh crore –
up a healthy 21 percent from this year’s actual budget, which was achieved in
freight may actually see selective rate cuts in order to improve the railways’
share of cargoes, which have been continuously going down for years now. This
was not stated explicitly, but indirectly through talks of “rationalising”
freight structures. Building adequate warehousing and expansion of the kinds of
freight carried by rail (cars are next, with the proposed creation of an auto
hub in Chennai) are some of the steps to win back market share from roadways.
while fares for the aam aadmi will
not go up much, Prabhu is making efforts to offer differentiated services to
make some passenger services cost-neutral, if not profitable. Among three such
initiatives are Humsafar and Tejas, two value-added AC passenger services that
will recover costs fully, either by way of fares or with non-fare revenues
(like advertising, additional paid passenger services, etc). A third, Utkrisht,
will offer double-decker services on high-density routes to expand carrying
capacity by 40 percent.
Prabhu also wants to expand revenues from non-fare sources like monetising land
banks along tracks, advertising, use of its customer database to cross-sell
products, and bringing in private funds for station development and train
What can go wrong in this scenario?
The key to fulfilling these ambitious
plans is to get state governments to chip in with some cash for projects dear
to them. Also, obtaining multilateral funding. Neither is certain in the
current global climate.
The attempt to keep fares low is
counter-productive. The level of subsidies is simply too high to be
justifiable, and it is doubtful that non-fare revenues can make up for the deficit.
Sooner or later, this has to be fixed.
The focus on passenger comfort and
customer orientation is good, but if this results in increased patronage of the
railways, it will lead to larger losses.
But these are issues that need
ironing out steadily, and possibly the attempt to raise fares commensurate with
costs will come outside the budget.
Meanwhile, the Modi-fied Railway Budget presented by Suresh Prabhu needs at least two cheers.
As you are no doubt aware, Swarajya is a media product that is directly dependent on support from its readers in the form of subscriptions. We do not have the muscle and backing of a large media conglomerate nor are we playing for the large advertisement sweep-stake.
Our business model is you and your subscription. And in challenging times like these, we need your support now more than ever.
We deliver over 10 - 15 high quality articles with expert insights and views. From 7AM in the morning to 10PM late night we operate to ensure you, the reader, get to see what is just right.
Becoming a Patron or a subscriber for as little as Rs 1200/year is the best way you can support our efforts.