Swarajya Logo
Swarajya Logo
Politics States Economy Society Business Culture Infra Defence World Books Ideas Science Technology Heritage Archives Legal Movies Sports
  • Our Views
    Politics States Economy Society Business Culture Infra Defence World Books Ideas Science Technology Heritage Archives Legal Movies Sports
  • Magazine
  • Store

About Swarajya

Swarajya is a publication by Kovai Media Private Limited.

Swarajya - a big tent for liberal right of centre discourse that reaches out, engages and caters to the new India.

editor@swarajyamag.com

Useful Links

  • About Us
  • Subscriptions Support
  • Editorial Philosophy
  • Press Kit
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Code of Conduct
  • Plagiarism Policy
  • Refund & Cancellation Policy

Useful Links

  • About Us
  • Subscriptions Support
  • Editorial Philosophy
  • Press Kit
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Code of Conduct
  • Plagiarism Policy
  • Refund & Cancellation Policy

Participate

  • Contact Us
  • Write for us
  • Style Guide
  • Jobs

Stay Connected

  • Artboard 2 Copy 6Created with Sketch.
    Artboard 2 Copy 10Created with Sketch.
    Artboard 2 Copy 7Created with Sketch.
    Artboard 2 Copy 9Created with Sketch.
  • Andriod Logo
  • IOS Logo

Politics

SC Collegium Sucks, Even Judges Agree: It’s Not Possible For CJI To “Sort It Out”

R JagannathanMonday, September 5, 2016 9:21 am IST
Supreme Court of India
Supreme Court of India
Supreme Court of India
  • The collegium is the accused in this misappropriation of power case; it, therefore, has no business “sorting it out” amongst itself, when the government, the legislatures, and the people are an interested party in the outcome.
  • Thus, the nation owes a vote of thanks to Justice Chelameswar, who said not once, but twice, that the collegium is not the best way to select and appoint judges to the upper judiciary.
  • It finally needed a sitting judge and member of the unaccountable Supreme Court collegium to call a spade a spade. A few days ago, Justice J Chelameswar, the fifth senior-most judge in the Supreme Court, dashed off a letter to Chief Justice of India (CJI) TS Thakur that he will not be participating in the collegium’s future meetings due to its lack of transparency and failure to record its proceedings.

    An embarrassed CJI told the media that “we will sort it out”, when there is nothing to sort out behind closed doors. Issues of transparency and usurpation of the power to appoint judges are not matters to sort out by the collegium. The collegium is the accused in this misappropriation of power case; it, therefore, has no business “sorting it out” amongst itself, when the government, the legislatures, and the people are an interested party in the outcome.

    It is surprising that no one has been willing to say that the emperors of justice had no clothes. The nation thus owes a vote of thanks to Justice Chelameswar, who said not once, but twice, that the collegium is not the best way to select and appoint judges to the upper judiciary. Before he sent his recent letter to the CJI, Justice Chelameswar wrote a lone, but eloquently argued, dissenting note in the National Judicial Appointments Commission (NJAC) case where the majority opinion was to scrap it.

    Justice Chelameswar wrote in his dissenting judgment: “Transparency is a vital factor in constitutional governance... Transparency is an aspect of rationality. The need for transparency is more in the case of an appointment process.” He added, for good measure, that the collegium system was not transparent even to its own members: “The records are absolutely beyond the reach of any person, including the judges of this court who are not lucky enough to become the Chief Justice of India. Such a state of affairs does not either enhance the credibility of the institution or does good for the people of this country.”

    He disputed his fellow judges’ adherence to the idea of the “primacy of the judiciary” in the appointment of judges, finding this to be “wholly illogical and inconsistent with the foundations of the theory of democracy and a doctrinal heresy.” He could have added that in no democracy do judges appoint themselves barring India.

    These are strong words, and a stinging rebuke of the self-serving verdict of the five-judge NJAC bench, whose head, Justice JS Khehar, will become the next Chief Justice when the current incumbent hangs up his robes on 3 January, 2017.

    In his recent letter to the Chief Justice intimating him of his decision to not attend collegium meetings, Justice Chelameswar is understood to have written to emphasise the transparency point indirectly: he asked the collegium to send him their recommendations in writing so that he could give his views in writing.

    This is smart. If Justice Chelameswar has merely recused himself from the collegium on grounds of conscience, it could have continued as if nothing happened. But by remaining a part of the collegium and still demanding transparency, Justice Chelameswar has proved that he was willing to fight for his views and, in the process, done the nation a service.

    That many current and past CJIs have a vested interest in continuing with the collegium system is obvious, for who wants his past decisions being questioned? A Times of India story yesterday (4 September) said that three former CJIs admitted that Justice Chelameswar had a point, but none of them attacked the idea of the collegium itself. The collegium sucks, and this needs acceptance by present and past judges of the Supreme Court.

    It seems likely that the three former CJIs – RM Lodha, KG Balakrishnan and P Sathasivam – who spoke, may not have an overwhelming interest in ensuring transparency. While ex-CJI Balakrishnan said the collegium must have consensus, he was against disclosure on how the choices were made through a formal system of recording who supported or voted against whom. Then where is the transparency?

    Ex-CJI Lodha said Justice Chelameswar “has a point” but then went on to say that “it was not a good sign” that the internal differences with the collegium were being aired in public, even warning that “people” may take advantage of this controversy. It needs no genius to figure out that the “people” Lodha mentioned was the government, which has been locked in a dispute over the Memorandum of Procedure on judicial selections, where the government wants some say.

    Ex-CJI Lodha is wrong to presume that the outside world does not need to know what is happening in the collegium, for the basics of transparency involve letting the real “people” know how judges were selected, for what reason, and why.

    CJI Thakur, who has been busy using theatrics in public, including an occasional breakdown in public to get the Narendra Modi government to speed up the appointment of judges on the collegium’s terms, has said that “we will sort it out”, the reference being to Justice Chelameswar’s stand. But what is there to sort out barring the termination of the opaque collegium system and giving the executive some say in the appointment of judges?

    Tags
    Narendra Modi
    Supreme COurt
    Collegium
    CJI
    CJI Thakur
    Justice Chelameswar
    Ex-CJI Lodha
    Ex-CJI Balakrishnan

    Comments ↓

    An Appeal...


     

    Dear Reader,

     

    As you are no doubt aware, Swarajya is a media product that is directly dependent on support from its readers in the form of subscriptions. We do not have the muscle and backing of a large media conglomerate nor are we playing for the large advertisement sweep-stake.

     

    Our business model is you and your subscription.  And in challenging times like these, we need your support now more than ever.

     

    We deliver over 10 - 15 high quality articles with expert insights and views. From 7AM in the morning to 10PM late night we operate to ensure you, the reader, get to see what is just right.

     

    Becoming a Patron or a subscriber for as little as Rs 1200/year is the best way you can support our efforts.

    Get Swarajya in your inbox.


    Magazine


    Swarajya Magazine Cover Image
    Merchandise

    Merchandise


      Politics

      The Sacrifices That Sealed A Commitment - 'Mandir Vahin Banaayenge'

      The Sacrifices That Sealed A Commitment - 'Mandir Vahin Banaayenge'

      Aravindan Neelakandan
      9m

      Madhya Pradesh: Axis-My India Predicts Huge Victory For BJP As Other Exit Polls Suggest Close Contest With Congress

      Swarajya Staff
      3h

      Axis-My India Exit Poll Gives Clear Majority To Congress In Telangana, Others Predict Close Contest With BRS

      Nishtha Anushree
      18h

      Economy

      Sorry, Cassandras. India's GDP Could Well Top 7 Per Cent In Fiscal 2023-24

      Sorry, Cassandras. India's GDP Could Well Top 7 Per Cent In Fiscal 2023-24

      R Jagannathan
      1d

      India's GDP Grows 7.6 Per Cent In July-September Quarter

      Nayan Dwivedi
      2d

      India's Fiscal Deficit Stood At Rs 8.037 Lakh Crore In First Seven Months Of Fiscal Year

      Swarajya News Staff
      2d

      Defence

      India To Secure Entire Pakistan And Bangladesh Borders In Next Two Years: Home Minister Amit Shah On BSF Day

      India To Secure Entire Pakistan And Bangladesh Borders In Next Two Years: Home Minister Amit Shah On BSF Day

      Nayan Dwivedi
      20h

      Indian Navy Makes History By Appointing First Female 'Commanding Officer' Of A Naval Ship

      Swarajya Staff
      22h

      Centre Putting All-Out Efforts To Bring Them Back: Indian Navy Chief On Veterans Sentenced To Death In Qatar

      Swarajya Staff
      22h

      World

      New Zealand: Three Khalistani Extremists Sentenced For Attempted Murder Of Radio Host Harnek Singh

      New Zealand: Three Khalistani Extremists Sentenced For Attempted Murder Of Radio Host Harnek Singh

      Swarajya Staff
      23m

      Brazilian City Council Unknowingly Enacts First AI-Written Ordinance

      Swarajya Staff
      2h

      Pannun Case: Do We Have Some Counter-Leverage Against US?

      R Jagannathan
      3h

      Culture

      Why The Insidious Anti-Hindu Communalism Of Certain Directors Goes Scot-Free

      Why The Insidious Anti-Hindu Communalism Of Certain Directors Goes Scot-Free

      Anonymous Contributor
      41m

      Napoleon Film Review: Ridley Scott’s Waterloo

      Venu Gopal Narayanan
      2h

      Kashi Tamil Sangamam 2023 To Be Held From 17 December To 30 December, Registration Portal Launched By IIT Madras

      S Rajesh
      3d
      States

      infrastructure


      Arun Kumar Das
      1

      Government Propels National Green Hydrogen Mission With Kochi Workshop

      2 Mins Read
      Arun Kumar Das
      2

      Railways Achieves 1015.6 Million Tonnes Freight Loading Between April-November 2023

      1 Mins Read
      V Bhagya Subhashini
      3

      Bengaluru Airport: BIAL Reveals Comprehensive Master Plan For T1 Upgrade And T3 Construction By 2030

      2 Mins Read
      Amit Mishra
      4

      Noida Proposes To Build 35 Km Elevated Road Along The Yamuna To Ease Travel To Greater Noida

      2 Mins Read